This is just the latest saga of the oldest political story in the world. Does the individual serve the state, or does the state serve the individual? You can dress it up as monarchism, feudalism, facism, communism, or the new world order, it still comes down to the individual being subordinate to the powers that be.
Some two hundred and thirty years ago, we started a new experiment, never before tried on a grand scale - that the state would be subject to its citizens. And though we were not, and are not, perfect, the world changed for the better with that one bold concept.
We are the descendants of that noble tradition. Our fathers and grandfathers, their wives and sisters, kept it alive in two world wars. Their father and grandfathers kept it alive in a bloody civil war.
I find it my civic duty and a point of personal honor to keep the plutocrats at bay.
The names we call things change. Five hundred years ago, we called the powers that were duke, duchess, baron, etc. These days, we call them CEO's, titans of industry, and what-not. Same s**t, different era.
Now before somebody jumps me for confusing the state with business interests, I can assure you, I did not.
Some two hundred and thirty years ago, we started a new experiment, never before tried on a grand scale - that the state would be subject to its citizens. And though we were not, and are not, perfect, the world changed for the better with that one bold concept.
We are the descendants of that noble tradition. Our fathers and grandfathers, their wives and sisters, kept it alive in two world wars. Their father and grandfathers kept it alive in a bloody civil war.
I find it my civic duty and a point of personal honor to keep the plutocrats at bay.
The names we call things change. Five hundred years ago, we called the powers that were duke, duchess, baron, etc. These days, we call them CEO's, titans of industry, and what-not. Same s**t, different era.
Now before somebody jumps me for confusing the state with business interests, I can assure you, I did not.