PITbull
Veteran
- Dec 29, 2002
- 7,784
- 456
I never stated any maa f/a got repremanded for not saying express. What I did say was they have every right to because it states in in our announcements to say express.
Why do you think we have this lawsuit out..it's because we wanted to be considered mainline and no one fought for us to get that. Or at least not enough.
ny,
You were not mainline. Therefore, there would be no fight. MAA's main premise in concession #1 and #2 and during BK was having a low cost carrier within a carrier under separate work rules, benefits, and wages; a Division. American Eagle provisions was a 5 day discussion right before the deadline hour of liquidation threats. I know you were NOT on the property then as MAA was just a premise. No planes were purchased and no flights were operating.
You don't know the history of MAA genesis. Only that you took the job there and think you were screwed out of being mainline.
I don't understand that thinking or the lawsuit. The history in the brief is "flawed" and not accurate.
There is no way that you would be recalled "out of seniority" if MAA were mainline. That would be violating section 19 of our agreement regarding furloughees. The company would NOT negotiate "longevity" for MAA. Trust, that it was discussed, and they would not have it under any circumstance. They would have just as well been happy to hire off the street for this "division" if no invols wanted these jobs. Deep concessions were given by All active mainline employees of USAirways for the purpose of starting up MAA so the company could compete against the LCCs.
That is why the pilots gave up so much of their wages and workrules. They protected their invols by making sure the company's MAA would provide "jets for jobs". That's how the agreements were ratified in concession #1 and 2.