What's new

Little's Next Tactic Against Agw

Hopeful

Veteran
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
5,998
Reaction score
347
Now that the Little and the TWU have once again disrespected the mechanics, he will soon have to resort to unorthodox tactics to fend off the AGW card drive.

But he won't rape the cargo and cabin cleaner folks. No sir! He will tell them that if they reject AGW, we will upgrade them all to mechanics!
 
Hopeful said:
Now that the Little and the TWU have once again disrespected the mechanics, he will soon have to resort to unorthodox tactics to fend off the AGW card drive.

But he won't rape the cargo and cabin cleaner folks. No sir! He will tell them that if they reject AGW, we will upgrade them all to mechanics!
Yea but at Fleet Service wages!
 
If they ask you to sign a card for the AGW drive do it. This way the NMB will have no choice but to call for an election.

Then next year they can return the favor to us. Since the only way to get an election at AA is to have all title groups sign AMFA cards. After all the only people not considered Title 1 are title groups between title 3 and title 4 which I believe is title group 3.5
 
MORE PROOF THAT YOU ONLY NEED "THEM" WHEN THEY ARE OF ANY BENEFIT TO YOUR AMFA CAUSE!!!!


THANKS AGAIN FOR PROVING US CORRECT!!!!
 
TWUer,
where were the EXTRA names on the list when the TWA/AA seniority issue was arbitrated by Kasher?
 
Hopeful said:
TWUer,
where were the EXTRA names on the list when the TWA/AA seniority issue was arbitrated by Kasher?
I don't know Hopeful. Don't have enough knowledge on the subject to give any kind of credible response.
 
The AGW has no hope of getting sufficient cards at AA.

The NMB has overlapped the fleet service responsibilities with Mechanic and Related and is ever changing. That is why Amfa and IAM have a disagreement at United!
 
You would think that the names would have been included during the Kasher arbitration.
 
And you would think that the amfa lawyers would have been smart enough to add those legitimate names the TWU added. I mean they did it at the other airlines they wanted didn't they???? They argued for them when they needed them and against them when they didn't. What kind of sense does that make??????
 
Checking it Out said:
The AGW has no hope of getting sufficient cards at AA.

The NMB has overlapped the fleet service responsibilities with Mechanic and Related and is ever changing. That is why Amfa and IAM have a disagreement at United!
I would not be so sure about the AGW. You have to remember that the workforce is pretty evenly spread out between high cost and lower, but not as low as Tulsa, cost areas.
The AGW only plans on collecting half dues from part timers, that in itself will get a lot of part timers to sign cards.


There you go again blaming someone else for what the TWU did. The TWU agreed to overlap resposibilities as part of their systematic destruction of our profession.
 
MORE PROOF THAT YOU ONLY NEED "THEM" WHEN THEY ARE OF ANY BENEFIT TO YOUR AMFA CAUSE!!!!


THANKS AGAIN FOR PROVING US CORRECT!!!!




It was not "I" who included "them" on the eligible to vote list you jackass. This was the decision of the NMB and the fact that AA and the twu over inflated the list to deter a vote at AA. So go drink another Schmits papito :lol: :lol:
 
Back
Top