Tim Nelson
Veteran
You should. Im not addressing your or the other lackeys even when im responding.I'm with you Rat... let's put the banker, and Tim on ignore...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You should. Im not addressing your or the other lackeys even when im responding.I'm with you Rat... let's put the banker, and Tim on ignore...
The current CWA/IBT Passenger Service Agents contract allows 30 mainline LUS cities to be outsourced and replacement thru attrition. Agents working side by side with contractors
That makes sense. Weez is pretty easy to figure out. He threw his own local under the bus after he only got 11 total votes due to him blasting nyer (obviously it backfired). Weez even told peeps that the only reason why he got destroyed was because he was from new york...but isnt nyer as well from new york?Weez wants STL to stay open so transfers out of MIA can be cleared and he will get to outbid LLCers for vacation time if they go back to STL for DOH.
Josh
Omg...stop being a knuclehead! They work side by side. Thats the grandfather language. Came from northwest.Are you speaking of Article 3, Paragraph E? If that’s the Article you are referring to as I read just that part it’s less than 35 weekly departures to be considered for outsourcing. Unless there is still one individual working there as of the date of signing of the agreement. (Station Protection)
That does not mean you work side by side with a vendor. What that means is when the last person leaves in any way “””THEN””” the Company has the right to outsource. Future hires after DOS don’t count for the protection.
Are you talking about something else I’m missing on my little phone?
http://unionhall.cwalocals.org/system/files/ta_article_3_rev_10_30_15.pdf
I am by no means an expert on the CWA CBA, but I’ve heard that their is language that allows management or a vendor to assist them in their duties.Are you speaking of Article 3, Paragraph E? If that’s the Article you are referring to as I read just that part it’s less than 35 weekly departures to be considered for outsourcing. Unless there is still one individual working there as of the date of signing of the agreement. (Station Protection)
That does not mean you work side by side with a vendor. What that means is when the last person leaves in any way “””THEN””” the Company has the right to outsource. Future hires after DOS don’t count for the protection.
Are you talking about something else I’m missing on my little phone?
http://unionhall.cwalocals.org/system/files/ta_article_3_rev_10_30_15.pdf
I am by no means an expert on the CWA CBA, but I’ve heard that their is language that allows management or a vendor to assist them in their duties.
My fly says It’s not decided yet.
Could stay at 40%. Like current IAM CBA
Could be 40% of FT employees. ( huge improvement)
Could go above 40% but that would have to be of Ft employees to be an improvement. (Still an improvement over current language as long as it doesn’t get too far above the 40%)
Are you referring towards mia or systemwide?That would be a terrible number for TWU since we currently stand at either 22% or 28%, depending on how you want to figure it.
Are you referring towards mia or systemwide?
I am by no means an expert on the CWA CBA, but I’ve heard that their is language that allows management or a vendor to assist them in their duties.
Please do!
Thanks bro. We just got our updated systemwide list in january on the lus side.System.
We're at about 27% or 35% in MIA, depending on your methodology.
Stations like SFO, SJU, TPA, STL, SAT, ATL are at about 50% FT/PT.
BOS & AUS are almost at 50%.
JFK, MCO & LAS are at about 2 to 1 FT to PT.
thanks john I would not want to work side by side with the replacement because it at least to me seems the company would at some point want to contract it out to those replacementsThe current CWA/IBT Passenger Service Agents contract allows 30 mainline LUS cities to be outsourced and replacement thru attrition. Agents working side by side with contractors
But if the choice was granfather or move to phl?thanks john I would not want to work side by side with the replacement because it at least to me seems the company would at some point want to contract it out to those replacements