cessna210g
Newbie
- Apr 13, 2004
- 8
- 3
December of what year?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol, yeah that's not likely.Vote out TWU! You could have the same perks as the IAM brother and sister. Oh yea, Happy Thanksgiving
That's another sorry industrial union. We need a mechanics only union.Vote out TWU! You could have the same perks as the IAM brother and sister. Oh yea, Happy Thanksgiving
Lol, yeah that's not likely.
Bigjets you do not offend me by grouping all Tulsa together anymore. The moron who spoke at the town hall showed there are still idiots who drink the koolaid. If the shoe fits you have to wear it. Tulsa was and is a problem. We vote for contracts to save jobs and then lost them anyway. Now the lowest time people who begged for a yes vote in 2012 and said they'd work any shift with any days off if they kept their jobs are crying about being stuck on lousy shifts with lousy days off. Funny how the attitude changes after they get their way. That TA passed by 48 votes system wide while 74% of Tulsa voted yes. I am proud to be one of the 26% who voted no. I tried to convince everyone to vote no but they listened to the fear tactics as usual. So I give up on Tulsa. Still too many idiots who couldn't figure anything out for themselves. By the way..... I printed up a lot of stuff about the IAMNPF and handed it to a guy who was saying good things about it. I told him to read the stuff and tell me if he still thought it was a good deal. He told me that it would take too long to read it. I went through and hi-lighted a few things that would prove that the IAMNPF is going under and he told me he couldn't believe it unless he read the whole thing! So this is why I have given up on Tulsa. All insults to Tulsa are well warranted.We lost the opportunity to vote out the Twu when Tulsa wouldn't support us(except for old guy). I've talked with LUS guys, they don't want to mess with their IAM pension, I don't think LAA line guys have the votes to do away with the Ass.
Bigjets you do not offend me by grouping all Tulsa together anymore. The moron who spoke at the town hall showed there are still idiots who drink the koolaid. If the shoe fits you have to wear it. Tulsa was and is a problem. We vote for contracts to save jobs and then lost them anyway. Now the lowest time people who begged for a yes vote in 2012 and said they'd work any shift with any days off if they kept their jobs are crying about being stuck on lousy shifts with lousy days off. Funny how the attitude changes after they get their way. That TA passed by 48 votes system wide while 74% of Tulsa voted yes. I am proud to be one of the 26% who voted no. I tried to convince everyone to vote no but they listened to the fear tactics as usual. So I give up on Tulsa. Still too many idiots who couldn't figure anything out for themselves. By the way..... I printed up a lot of stuff about the IAMNPF and handed it to a guy who was saying good things about it. I told him to read the stuff and tell me if he still thought it was a good deal. He told me that it would take too long to read it. I went through and hi-lighted a few things that would prove that the IAMNPF is going under and he told me he couldn't believe it unless he read the whole thing! So this is why I have given up on Tulsa. All insults to Tulsa are well warranted.
This guy won't read or think for himself. He won't believe anything I tell him though. I did point out that I had never lied to him but the TWU has and he had no defense. After admitting the TWU had lied while I hadn't he said he still wouldn't believe me. Can't make this stuff up folks. We got lots of stupid in Tulsa.Try explaining to your moronic coworker who is too lazy to read, that if the IAMNPF does happen to "go under", that when it does, the PBGC which would have take on the liability, is planning on running out of money to fund multi-employer plans within ten (10) years, if not sooner.
Here's a link in case he's computer literate:
http://pbgc.gov/news/press/releases...ivery&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery
I tried fighting this thing for years with my coworkers, but many of them are blind, deaf, and illiterate. So any insults coming our way are also warranted.
Try explaining to your moronic coworker who is too lazy to read, that if the IAMNPF does happen to "go under", that when it does, the PBGC which would have take on the liability, is planning on running out of money to fund multi-employer plans within ten (10) years, if not sooner.
Here's a link in case he's computer literate:
http://pbgc.gov/news/press/releases...ivery&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery
I tried fighting this thing for years with my coworkers, but many of them are blind, deaf, and illiterate. So any insults coming our way are also warranted.
Thanks for the link. Does the IAMNPF fall under the majority of multiemployer plans projected to remain solvent or the group unable to avoid insolvency?
"While the majority of multiemployer plans are projected to remain solvent over the next 20 years, a core group of plans appears unable to raise contributions sufficiently to avoid insolvency within that period."
Thanks for the link. Does the IAMNPF fall under the majority of multiemployer plans projected to remain solvent or the group unable to avoid insolvency?
"While the majority of multiemployer plans are projected to remain solvent over the next 20 years, a core group of plans appears unable to raise contributions sufficiently to avoid insolvency within that period."