AMFAinMIAMI said:
O/S
By your statement here I see you could admit that the system of how the negotiations were done was Flawed. We were at the mercy of the Few ATD members. Now the Association will send 3 IAM and 3 TWU members, with Tom Buff, sitting at the TOP for the first two yrs.
Bylaws won't make a difference if the Association gets in since they have re-written a set of their own.
Unless the TWU backs out of this deal we the mechanics of AA and US will be screwed again.
What is the real shame, having any title 2 guys in a fleet Local, they are per the NMB part of our class and craft and should be assigned to a local of their peers.
All the slogans they threw our way were just a JOKE. They Never had our best interest in mind. So there isn't any next time the TWU needs to go. You may not like the idea of that but
The TWU system is flawed, the rif's have not been done the same or our stock equity, the Prefunding money, our Holidays, vacation, pay structure, Even days off and shift bids are all done different at many stations. We are all on separate pages and that works in the best interest of the company not the membership. The ATD benefited from our cuts they got rich and we had to live under the BS they felt we deserved. They pushed the contracts to get them passed by selling on single point each time.
Yes without a doubt the AA/TWU system is flawed. Its flawed because the real decision makers can not be held accountable, they are all appointed and historically they hated the people they supposedly represented and Loved American Airlines. What Overspeed left out was that appointed International people determined what went on in negotiations, not elected leaders. The elected leaders would be corralled, cajoled or even threatened until the International was able to get a majority to approve what they agreed to as things such a a pension based on their TWU salary and A-5 pass travel were silently slipped into the deal. When all the Fleet Service clerks would show up for an M&R negotiations sessions we knew that Don had plans for a vote. Dons Single Local for Line maintenance failed to include all the Title II guys. Why? Because that left Aircraft Maintenance with just three Reps at the Presidents Council, and just three reps at negotiations, vs the possibility of up to six Fleet service clerks. It also kept 800 guys out of Local 591, which would place Local 591 well above 514 in membership.
In the early days of the BK the lawyers said that dumping the pension in the PBGC would satisfy nearly the entire "ask" and that we should not be alarmed since with over $5 billion in cash we would receive 100% of what we had earned up to the date it went to the PBGC, and that the PBGC would be the biggest shareholder in AA. The next day they claimed we had to change that strategy, give more concessions and have the pension frozen instead of terminated, we had to do that because "some TWU members would take a hit but refused to elaborate and determined that like it or not that was the path we were taking. they reminded us that in those negotiations the International had all and final say. So we ended up giving up more to save the Pensions of Jim Little, Bobby Gless, Don Videtich etc etc. Now as we see with the Alliance the intent is to have us all get put into the IAMNPF. Obviously that was the intent all along. If we had been placed in the PBGC I believe thats it, they could not touch our AA pensions and the PBGC would be rolling in money due to AA's skyrocketing stock values. Rolling us into the IAMNPF will likely be a better concession for AA than putting us in the PBGC, its like a Grand Slam for AA. They get to get rid of the pension and all the debt tied to it and they don't have to give the PBGC, or us, any equity for the shortfall in the funding that will simply disappear as we get swept into a pension where we can't retire until at least 65 and can't retire if we plan on still working somewhere else. Under our AA plan we can retire at 55, work somewhere else and only take a 15% hit against the pension, under the IAMNPF that goes up to a 48% hit, 100% if they catch you working. I've heard some of the IAM/Alliance cheerleaders claim that the IAMNPF would not want our AA funds, first they denied that there was any intent to have us put under the plan, but that fell flat when we reveal the intent letter that stated that was the case and their reasoning was flawed. They claim that the IAMNPF would not want our funds because of the underfunding but the underfunding is based on a plan where we can work and we can retire at 55 with only a 15% penally, 60 with zero penalty, vs the IAM plan where you get hit with a 48% penalty at 55 and a 24% penalty at 60. Most if not all of the "underfunding" would simply disappear if we were rolled into the IAMNPF, along with much of that value of our AA pension that we gave additional concessions in both 2003 and 2012 to preserve.
The AA/TWU structure is completely different than the rest of the TWU. Most Locals in the TWU, outside of the AA system, enjoy a large degree of autonomy and who the members pick really does determine what happens at negotiations. Local 100's approach to negotiations was radically different under Toussaint and Samuelson than it was under the company friendly leadership of of Sonny Hall but in the AA/TWU system who gets elected does not change who sits in high level negotiations, and that where all the deals are really cut. The Association is simply a more transparent version of that, where they won't even try to hide it.
The Association will make things worse for us. It creates a permanent structural division of the membership, not just through Locals under a common Constitution and leadership, but under completely different Collective Bargaining Agents with different Constitutions and leaderships and structures. Under the Association we end up with a collective bargaining agent that does not serve anyone that works under the Collective Bargaining agreement they broker, it has two masters, the President of the TWU and the President of the IAM. I would say that if we are forced into the Association that attempts at reforming the Association are pointless, its hard enough to fix what we have, it will be impossible to fix the Association. We would stand a higher likelihood of success if we follow the path of others at AA who have formed their own organizations with good success.
We should look at our Union Contract as the central reason for the existence of our Union and we need an agent that is their to serve us and ensure that our Contract serves our needs, not those of the Collective Bargaining Agent. Remember the slogan, "We are the Union, TWU, IAM, ETC they are simply the Collective Bargaining Agent, and they work for us, not the other way around, this Association is structured to turn that whole concept around the other way. We aren't treated as members but rather property of the TWU and IAM to be manipulated as it serves the interests of the two Presidents and not whats in the best interests of the people who have to live under the Collective Bargaining agreement. Our Contract is not something for two agents to split. Some say that this is better than having the agents fight each other over us. Well thats ridiculous, there can only be one, if one can't agree to step aside then fight it out. If two guys came courting your daughter because they didn't want to fight over her would you accept them, or run them both out of your house? None of the other Unionized work groups at AA sought out another Collective bargaining agent, they all formed their own. APA left ALPA and APFA left TWU, both went into BK at the top of the industry and came out that way, along with much higher 401k funding and in the case of the pilots more than triple the equity. None of those groups suffer the indignities we do. While I still believe there is a chance to fix the TWU through further consolidation, so that we at AA are modeled more like the TWU at SWA with the autonomy enjoyed by Locals such as SWA and Local 100, once we are tossed into the Alliance, its over. Change from within is impossible because under the Alliance agreement there is no Authority within, it all lies with the two Presidents. We cease to become members of the Collective bargaining agent that has control of our contract, the Association has no membership, instead our contract is being outsourced to an Association that answers only to the two international Presidents.
I know you want AMFA but if AMFA wanted us then they would be sinking a lot of money into this, even to the point of going to their current members and explaining how they can't negotiate higher wages at SWA because of the condition of wages at AA, US, UA and DL so they are committing millions of dollars into organizing and need to change their Constitution. But AMFA is not doing that. They aren't agressivley seeking to organize anybody and have withdrawn into their own little SWA world. A world that reality is slowly encroaching on as they live in denial. They will sit where they are watching their standard of living slowly decline as we drag them down to ours when in fact we should be pulling them up to UPS's.