IBT vs IAM

[AIRWOMAN]

I have not read the objection so I won't comment on it.

Thanks. I can appreciate that.

 

[700UW]

Do you have a link to it?

 

[AIRWOMAN]

Do you have a link to it?

No, do you? I would like to read it if you do.

 

[awausairtech]

you are totally wrong.......its a NMB ballgame now..........you asked for it..

As A Union Member I Stand By My Union , I Hope You Can Understand That. B) We Are The Union And If We Do Not Than There Is No Union, BUT WHEN THE UNION STANDS BY ITS SELF And Only For Its Self There Is No Union,IE THE IAM. :down:

 

[700UW]

IAM repsonse to ibt wanting to keep getting cards and exclude Stock Clerks

 

[gonzo]

IAM repsonse to ibt wanting to keep getting cards and exclude Stock Clerks

I can see were this will affect you directly 7. The stock clerks have a separate contract. The stock clerks will not be left out in the cold like you would want them to believe. It just sounds like the IAM is a little afraid

.

 

[EricLv2Fish]

IAM repsonse to ibt wanting to keep getting cards and exclude Stock Clerks

"Don't believe IBT rumors". Oh so you should believe IAM rumors then. Typical union rhetoric. That's a really cheap shot. When will unions grow up and conduct business in a professional mannner without mudslinging. Do they really think we need to be told not to believe rumors!? :down:

 

[AIRWOMAN]

I can see were this will affect you directly 7. The stock clerks have a separate contract. The stock clerks will not be left out in the cold like you would want them to believe. It just sounds like the IAM is a little afraid

.

Thanks for the link 700.

That's what I thought the issue was. And in all honesty, isn't this all part of the process?? A realignment of contracts. Just as Gonzo stated, the Stock Clerks would NOT be removed, just realigned under a different contract.........all depending, of course, how things end up.

I saw no mention of Utility. Is that going to go the way of the Ground Communication Technicans of the past IAM coverage? I would tend to believe that's true since the west has no Utility.

 

[EricLv2Fish]

Thanks for the link 700.

Just as Gonzo stated, the Stock Clerks would NOT be removed, just realigned under a different contract.........all depending, of course, how things end up.

Based on precedent being set by management with CSR, FAs and Pilots, IF stock clerks would be removed I doubt the East stock clerks would take a cut in pay or benefits. The most likely outcome would be the West would be slowly brought up to the East pay and benefits. Such a realignment would make sense. Stock clerks and mechanics are only REMOTELY related in the sense mechanics need parts to repair aircraft. Time to separate the apples from the oranges.

 

[gonzo]

This thread has degenerated into nonsense.

Ahhhh.....as so many have. 🙂

 

[delldude]

Please answer these questions this time around or tell me if you don't know.....one more time.

Then what is the objection that was filed all about??? The one filed, according to Delldude, on 2-28.

If you note it was IBT who filed the objection.
its quite obvious the issue is IBT 35% and with the mechanics only they probably are close to achieving it,but if utility and stock clerks are thrown in they are most likely way off the mark.if they had 35% of the 7000 or so they wouldn't be going down this avenue.

this was tried by AMFA at NWA with no success...we'll see shortly.

 

[700UW]

And at UA.

 

[gonzo]

I hope you fix planes better then you respond to posts on here.

7 you are not in any position to say anything about any of the AMT's quality of aircraft maintenance. IAM or IBT. Stick to what you know about. Aircraft maintenance is not one of your areas. 🙂

 

[700UW]

7 you are not in any position to say anything about any of the AMT's quality of aircraft maintenance. IAM or IBT. Stick to what you know about. Aircraft maintenance is not one of your areas. 🙂

Are you psychic and know everything about me?

Apparently you dont.

 

[Awa Contract]

Unlike you his work area is not in the toilet