IBT vs IAM
- Thread starter Bob Owens
- Start date
- Banned
- #77
See there you go again, posting about things you have no idea about.
The Maintenance Training Specialists, represented by the IAM reached a deal with the company.
And when you start negotiating with US while they are in chapter 11 and how they knew the judge would rule in their favor, then maybe you will understand.
And if you look around ALPA, AFA, CWA, IAM and the TWU at US all ended up with a raw deal, not one union got a great deal for their membership.
As a matter of fact look around the industry, ALPA, AFA, CWA, IAM, IBT, PFAA, TWU, and AMFA all have taken a beating at the legacy carriers.
But since you are a self-proclaimed expert on everything when it comes to unions and the airlines, I find it difficult for you to actually comprehend the truth and learn something.
The Maintenance Training Specialists, represented by the IAM reached a deal with the company.
And when you start negotiating with US while they are in chapter 11 and how they knew the judge would rule in their favor, then maybe you will understand.
And if you look around ALPA, AFA, CWA, IAM and the TWU at US all ended up with a raw deal, not one union got a great deal for their membership.
As a matter of fact look around the industry, ALPA, AFA, CWA, IAM, IBT, PFAA, TWU, and AMFA all have taken a beating at the legacy carriers.
But since you are a self-proclaimed expert on everything when it comes to unions and the airlines, I find it difficult for you to actually comprehend the truth and learn something.
AIRWOMAN
Veteran
- Oct 20, 2005
- 3,440
- 0
I never said or implied that the MX Trainers were under the Mechanic and Related contract. And what has that got to do with the FACT that the west MX Trainers have had a copy of their contract since September 2005??? Nothing!!
I told you before, I did ask Al. I still don't have one. Then you spew some crap about me not being union or an east employee and that's why I don't have one. Make up your mind. What's the real reason?? We may find out more than we have been able to see so far???
AIRWOMAN
Veteran
- Oct 20, 2005
- 3,440
- 0
No, I'm not at the present moment. But what about the mechanics that are?? As I said, the MX Trainers have a copy, I'm sure that the FA's have something, as well as the pilots.
Dog Wonder
Veteran
I believe there are 7 HP MTC Trainers.
AIRWOMAN
Veteran
- Oct 20, 2005
- 3,440
- 0
I'm sure one or more of them have or they will. And they do have a copy of THEIR CBA - IBT contract.
And this is the last beating that the dead horse will get......but this all goes back to the Single Carrier Status and the existing contracts, etc. remain until.........
AIRWOMAN
Veteran
- Oct 20, 2005
- 3,440
- 0
Honest mistake. Didn't mean to dredge that up again.BEATING??????????
Now there is something the IAM knows about!
funny...IBT petitioned to eliminate stockies and utes from the vote...hmmmAND I STAND BY MY STATEMENT THE VOTE IS ON!
The IBT Will Post It When They Have The Total Number As A Fact!( The Total Not Just 35%, JUST FOR YOU DIE HARD IAM BOYS )
I got this info from DC From SOMEONE CLOSE TO THE COUNT And Has The Known Legal Votes at 35%!
also petitioned NMB to let the cards keep coming in after the cutoff date of the 13th feb..(as per NMB rules) until U provides all signatures.....
Fred Says seems like someones altering the vote to make up for a poor card return......
Fred Says like he said before....they can't make the 35% with out splitting class and craft....
remember:
FRED SAID
Awa Contract
Veteran
- Oct 3, 2005
- 820
- 1
Sounds like Fred is expelling from the wrong hole again
IBT would have no issue in splitting stock and utility from the mechanics if they thought they had overwhelming numbers in cards.
IBT would have no issue with needing the deadline extended if they thought they had overwhelming numbers in cards.
Sounds like Fred's right on the money here.
Fred Says why then is IBT trying to have the NMB rules bent to favor them then if they have such a numerical advantage over IAM in cards then?
gonzo
Veteran
- Oct 17, 2005
- 902
- 0
Fred Says why then is IBT trying to have the NMB rules bent to favor them then if they have such a numerical advantage over IAM in cards then?
Bent? Why stop just because the NMB would be satisfied, keep going to make sure everyone is satisfied. You know the "climax" theory. There you go thinking of yourself again dell LOL.
because rules are what you operate by...not bending them to suit the case of the day.Bent? Why stop just because the NMB would be satisfied, keep going to make sure everyone is satisfied. You know the "climax" theory. There you go thinking of yourself again dell LOL.
did i get any spunk on you?
gonzo
Veteran
- Oct 17, 2005
- 902
- 0
LOL......aaah yea....that's what the IAM does. I'm sure the NMB will play by the rules, ask Fred. I'm thinking this is a new situation for the NMB considering all the possibilities that are occuring with this merger. Merger, Small vs Large membership, acquiring company, 2009 plus vs section 6, yada, yada, yada.
