- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #46
The plan was to take the company on and strike if the members rejected the contract. That is why a strike vote was taken at the same time.
So in other words they had no plan. You know damn well that the IAM, despite the strike vote, would never have called a strike. Didnt they take a strike vote in 2002, then when the mechanics rejected the agreement accept over $1 million from USAIR to conduct another vote?
It is not blaming the membership it is the reality of what happened, since you work for AA and not US, I would not expect you to know that.
Thats all you ever do. Blame the membership for poor leadership thats almost impossible to change. Well now they have the opportunity to change leadership and you say they shouldnt.
The fact is the IAM provided no leadership and no plan. The problems facing USAIR were not unique to USAIR, the whole industry was going after their workers and your leaders did nothing to counter the threat. Your statement about that since I do not work for USAIR, therefore ignorant as to what you faced, only proves my assertion that we are a divided fragmented labor movement and that is why these companies have been so successful at breaking us.
When UAL announced that were going to ty and have their contracts abrogated I sent out a letter to everyon on my list that if a judge abrogates any labor agreement we should all walk off the job. If our contracts are not protected then they are worthless. Jim Little demanded that I retract that statement. You fault the members. Why didnt the leaders of the IAM,IBT and TWU put aside their differences and threaten to shut doewm the country? Because they didnt really care and were not willing to fight for us thats why. Each saw this as an opportunity to gain members over the long haul. And you come on here and blame the membership!!! If they would have called fror a nationwide shutdown you know the members would have participated.
In 2002, there were hundreds of phone calls and e-mails by them members wanting to revote, I disagree with it and it should have stood.
Yea, but you defend the IAM despite the fact that they screwed their members. You come on here and say they had a plan, but the plan was to have them revote until it passses and you know it.
And since you dont work for US you don't remember former CEO Dave Siegel saying he was going to hold his own revote on the matter after being bombarded by calls and e-mails, do you?
And you believed him? What would give him the authority to hold such a vote? I remember warning you guys about Dave. Everything I said would happen did happen.
Some of the facilities are organized the majority are not as they are not true employees they are independant contractors, and if you have ever been involved in organizing a MRO, it is very difficult.
Thats because they fall under the NLRA. Its different and not as easy as the RLA but most union workers in this country that are not government workers fall under the NLRA. It cant be that difficult, its just the the ROI is not as good as RLA members for the unions due to the fact that in RTW states those who dont want to dont have to pay dues.
Besides, are the members wrong for expecting their unions to take on difficult objectives. or should they let them sit back on their six figure salaries?