I completely agree with you on including UPS and Fed Ex. Our co keeps stating they fly packages and we fly people so they say we cannot compare. What the teamsters failed to do was get that changed, instead they just agreed with the co that they cannot compare them. AMFA is currently using UPS as well as Fed Ex in our current nego's. Also, our dispatchers were successful at using the UPS dispatchers and other airlines dispatchers contracts with a mediator or in arbitration and jumped their contract the largest jump they have ever had, were talking up to a 40K difference in all in top out. The mere fact that SWA argues that we fly humans should put us above UPS wages not below. The responsibility of human lives over the responsibility of packages should be outweighed 10 fold, should it not? Can't wait to see where the UPS guys go to after their new contract.D7571987 said:Im a UA guy but we are all in the same boat here so Im putting out my thoughts here:
We need to expand our mechanic wage comparison to include UPS and Fedex.
Nowdays the airlines are even more profitable than the shipping companies so managements excuses to exclude them are no longer valid.
Non union fedex is at $53 , UPS teamsters are at least $50.31 from a contract from April 2011 and are in negotiations and reportedly looking for $60 ish.
Southwest has been at $43.90 approx for about 5 or 6 years and currently in negotiations.
Delta recently to $46.15.
I feel that the Delta number is low and if anything we ought to average Delta at 46 , Fedex at 53 and UPS at just say $56 which added together and divided by 3 gives us $51.66 as something that an aircraft mechanic at a major airline should be making and yes Fedex and Ups are major airlines.
I did re-read and concur. It's been as of late that most postings on this 3%-7% issue it seems most are ok with the 3% that Parker changed his mind over. But I will also add this Bob. We have not heard any union member, or anything from the union itself saying they will be going in and demanding the original 7% over. But we have been reading a lot of postings just accepting the 3% and still only hoping they will still get that. I hope you guys get industry leading (and yes I include UPS and FE when I say that) and I hope you guys get everything back as the association has promised. All passenger airline mechanics should in fact be above any package haulin airliner.Bob Owens said:
Reread what I wrote. I said "the company has already committed to giving us". Obviously the higher UAL raises the bar the higher the base line is for us.
Correct. I have always said that sometimes scope is even more important, it's a tactic for companies to self pay for the raises so not to pull from the record profits and scope language is where they try to get that back. It usually never fails when a co offers big raises, they were more than likely able to slip in some kinda language changes to more than make up for it.texasreb said:It's not all about wages. Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't United wanting your scope to include lost jobs through outsourcing. We need to look at the scope as well.