B6Busdriver
Advanced
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2003
- Messages
- 194
- Reaction score
- 0
WHat about travel benies for furloughees? Thanks
rjh said:Well, even though the prirority for reitrees goes from SA2 to SA4, it's only a "one-priority" drop. SA2 is now for interviewees & emergency travel; SA3 is for active employees. I think it's fair that active employees get priority over retirees (just my opinion).
Adding a $15 service charge also makes sense, I'm just surprised they didn't institute a service charge for everybody. Extra weight uses extra fuel; and with fuel prices we need to save as much as we can. Even if an extra person increases the fuel burn by only 50 lbs--that's about 8 gallons, which at current prices is $16!
I do hate that we can't use Flexis for FC upgrades--and especially that upgrades to Europe will be $100!!!! I also don't like losing Flexis as $20 towards parent travel--but again, we have to collect money for the extra fuel costs.
[post="304611"][/post]
First of all, the childish name calling doesn't deserve a reply.sharkstooth said:Bull poop!
You are truly ignorant or stupid when it comes to costs.
Let me see, here.
Extra 2000 lbs. on a five hour flight costs, yep, $37, according to my Sabre flightplan. So, mr. I cannot think, that means a 150 lb. person, according to Sabre, costs about $2.77.
Once again, the employees have been taken....and the "benefit" has become a "profit center".
[post="305313"][/post]
40 passes per yr x 47,000 employees = a whole lotta ppl flying on employee flying benefits, i certainly dont mind sharing my benefits with friends and family. BUT thats a whole lotta tickets to be basically giving away!rjh said:First of all, the childish name calling doesn't deserve a reply.
My estimates were based on increasing payload on a PHX-JFK flight (using Eagle) by 200 lbs--yielded a burn increase of 50 pounds.
The actual cost doesn't matter. What matters is carrying extra people increases costs. That includes fuel, soft drinks, and time spent by employees. Sure, all of those costs don't amont to much for 1 person. But they all add up. We are still a business, and exist to make money.
Our flight benefits are still a tremendous BENEFIT (not a "right"). It becomes even more of a BENEFIT when we can extend cheap flights to spouses, children, parents, and friends.
Why not appreciate what you DO have instead of bitching about what you don't have???
[post="305322"][/post]
TheNewLowFare said:By the way, what is the incentive now with perfect attendance?
I agree 100%proudf/a said:40 passes per yr x 47,000 employees = a whole lotta ppl flying on employee flying benefits, i certainly dont mind sharing my benefits with friends and family. BUT thats a whole lotta tickets to be basically giving away!
[post="305328"][/post]
airlinedivalish said:Why don't you SHUT THE HELL UP? You'd be a treat to fly with.
[post="305250"][/post]
Schatzee said:Hmmmmm..... sounds like somebody snagged her panties on the fence they are TRYING to build around PHX.......
View attachment 3352
[post="305334"][/post]
EricLv2Fish said:UPNAWAY, There had to be some compromises. Compromise = Both parties giving something up. HP gains alot more places to fly on our own airline. That in and of itself is worth sacrificing alot in my HP opinion. All employees get 2 SA1 vacation passes a year that will counter DOH. Let's keep things in perspective please. How many airlines would put in place an employee feedback on pass travel? Relax, you will have workable employee pass travel benefits with a ton of places to fly. B)
[post="305058"][/post]
Schatzee said:Since when do you need incentive to go to work everyday you are not sick?!? Grow up......
[post="305332"][/post]
MarkMyWords said:Spoken just like MPA. :down:
[post="305491"][/post]
Schatzee said:Hmmmmm..... sounds like somebody snagged her panties on the fence they are TRYING to build around PHX.......
View attachment 3352
[post="305334"][/post]