hillary 2016

[delldude]

^^^^^^^^^ ROTFLMAO^^^^^^^^^^

YGBKM. That is out there, even for you Dude.

And as to your claim about the polls...Hillary could just go dark and let Trump do his thing for the next couple of weeks and let him continue to flush himself down the toilet.

BTW, Who is the OP of the "Trump Polling" thread? You know...the guy who uses the "rigged" NY Times to kick off the thread.

http://www.airlineforums.com/threads/trump-polling.59883/

Looks like I was right. ^^

NYT swings both ways when readership is down.

Please show me where I claimed NYT is rigging polls.

http://truthfeed.com/busted-fake-nb...ts-was-conducted-by-a-hillary-superpac/28809/

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/

 

[delldude]

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/

Make this go away:

http://truthfeed.com/busted-fake-nb...ts-was-conducted-by-a-hillary-superpac/28809/

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

 

[Kev3188]

Just curious: has anyone on here already voted?

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

I can vote early soon. Then, just for Delldude, I will vote again on Nov 8 (and Nov 28 for Trump).

 

[delldude]

View attachment 11355 View attachment 11354

 

[delldude]

I can vote early soon. Then, just for Delldude, I will vote again on Nov 8 (and Nov 28 for Trump).

You're not that cunning.

Here:

Regardless, you can read a defense of the poll’s methodology here. You should also read this New York Times piece (published as this article was in production), which is a bit overstated in the title, but it does a nice job illustrating how the sometimes-arbitrary decisions of pollsters can have substantial effects on their findings. While you are at it, check out this piece, which makes a similar point.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/10/14/why_pay_attention_to_the_la_times_poll.html

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

I remember that poll being described on the shows this weekend as a small sampling size and leaning Dem. If you choose to look at only one poll, then you get a short view. That is why I look at it from a strictly statistical methodology. FiveThirtyEight and Real Clear Politics as a metasource has far greater accuracy.

You can tout that poll as being skewed, however they did nothing to hide the sampling method. I never look at a poll without looking at the methodology.

You can see from 538's data, where each polling agency/org stands.

 

[delldude]

I know. You look at the results after the 2nd debate?

Man, some were off the charts while most others showed a slight bump.

MSM is showing themselves to the country as abject fools.

 

[Zom JFK]

Don't forget that the morning of Brexit the polls showed remain at just over ten points ahead. Anyone that thinks these polls or the media are for real is still plugged into the matrix.

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

Thanks for the lesson Mr. Rove. I will defer to President Romney.

 

[Insp4]

I see the first Lady is out stumping for Hillary. She says that she is shaken to her core because of the Trump video. Well,....... If that is so, what does she feel about this? http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/...-makes-shocking-allegation-bill-clinton-rape/

 

[Insp4]

Why has our political system degenerated to this point where they both are resorting to these tactics?........I guess you can write it off to desperation.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

hey nothing wrong with a little influence peddling at least she didnt call a beauty queen fat

I am sure everyone on this forum has said much worse about a celebrity.