of course the presidents fault, nothing to do with the int'l....No, this is the company's fault. They haven't scheduled any meetings.
The Presidents should file 29d
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
of course the presidents fault, nothing to do with the int'l....No, this is the company's fault. They haven't scheduled any meetings.
The Presidents should file 29d
No, I said it was the company's fault. Calm down slim.of course the presidents fault, nothing to do with the int'l....
Got a call back on it to. Company wants some crazy formula just to get a penny. International wants a formula that gets more of their buddies off the clock. Local wants it tied to a simple formula that can always be met. Local loses two to one, so therefore it is at a standoff.
What would they ask for? A Meeting?No, this is the company's fault. They haven't scheduled any meetings.
The Presidents should file 29d
The companys fault? I would say its the worthless unions fault for negotiating a contract with undefined and open language! Come on overspeed. Spin this one into AMFAs failure!!!No, this is the company's fault. They haven't scheduled any meetings.
The Presidents should file 29d
Wasn't this Videtich's baby? A year into the contract and nobody even knows what it is.of course the presidents fault, nothing to do with the int'l....
No, I said it was the company's fault. Calm down slim.
Wasn't this Videtich's baby? A year into the contract and nobody even knows what it is.
Obama wasn't appointed.Sounds a lot like President Obamas Affordable Care Act that you defend on another thread!
Why is open language in our contract any different than Legislation that no one knows where it will end up?
This contract was shoved down our throats by TWU minions.
Are you one of them?
The ACA was by Socialist minions.
Are you one of them?
Not trying to change the topic!
You are making claims based upon a poorly worded inarticulate response from Nancy Pelosi that has been spun out of context by the extreme right but let me explain one difference, the ACA is thousands of pages long, and is pretty specific, if anything there is too much info to process which is very different than saying that we are going to have a gain sharing plan with no specifics whatsoever but you should vote yes because of it then a year into the deal still no specifics, not even a meeting. The Gain sharing plan was sold as a reason to vote for this deal by Overspeed and Don Videtich. So here we are a year later and we have Dons alter ego saying thats its the company's fault for not scheduling any meetings and the Local Presidents fault for not filing a grievance. Why would the company schedule a meeting for something where in theory they would have to share what they took from us? The Presidents do not own the contract, the International does, what would they grieve? where is the violation when the International has allowed the company to not settle this? If anything the members should file a DFR against Don Videtich and the International for promising something and then not following through or even making any effort to put something in place. Thats the difference but as I type this I know I'm wasting my time because you have already made up your narrow little mind.Gain Sharing? Is the Title!
The topic is about articles in our contract not being enforced and loosely worded language.
A lot of the people administering the ACA will be appointed!
The topic of MY post was why YOU condone it when it is the Federal Govt. but call out TWU leadership for their failure.
Still waiting for an answer. You should apply for the White House press secretary!