BoeingBoy
Veteran
- Nov 9, 2003
- 16,512
- 5,865
- Banned
- #46
I can come up with 3 reasons, though I'm not sure that they're individually or collectively worth the uproar the change has created. In descending order of importance (my order only):To me honest I reallly don't think they know why they did it
1 - reduce CASM. Every mile these planes fly, they'll produce 6 more seat-miles with negligable additional cost. A 1000 mile flight will produce 6,000 additional seat miles. CASM on these planes will drop a couple of percent.
2 - incremental revenue. Whenever this results in selling additional seats, extra revenue will result. How much that will be is anybodies guess, as is whether it will offset the loss of FF's for whom this is the last straw. But the extra revenue side can be quantified in advance (more or less) will the revenue loss side can't.
3 - standardization. Eventually, the operation will be fully integrated and it will be better if the seat configuration is the same. I put this last because so far there has been no push to standardize the 737's or 757's, so standardization can't be that important to them.
Jim