AANOTOK
Veteran
- Oct 10, 2009
- 4,627
- 2,242
You don't deserve a response!700UW said:You know what if AA decided to pay you $10 an hour?
What would you do?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You don't deserve a response!700UW said:You know what if AA decided to pay you $10 an hour?
What would you do?
Hypocrite.AANOTOK said:You don't deserve a response!
Coward!700UW said:Hypocrite.
Its in the IAM FS CBA, its contractual, just as is your pay, so if AA paid you $10 an hour what would you do?
Maybe the gate agent made a mistake?nycbusdriver said:
Only because of two misconnects. Had they shown up, I would be left standing there, while two non-revs (one who worked for a wholly-owned less than a year), who could not have possibly listed before me, flew to destination.
I can only hope it happen to you on regular basis, especially when its the last flight out.
Sounds like the way the US people are trying to force their non rev system on the AA people.700UW said:So as long as you got yours screw everyone else.
Great way to build solidarity between AA and US workers.
No one is forcing anything, they are wanting their Collective Bargaining Agreement enforced.blue collar said:Sounds like the way the US people are trying to force their non rev system on the AA people.
700UW said:No one is forcing anything, they are wanting their Collective Bargaining Agreement enforced.
I'm not arguing that it shouldn't be grieved. I agree that it should, but non rev travel is much more of a grey area than compensation. There's nothing stopping the company from charging for travel, or from revoking it from everyone. I don't think that should fleet/agents win their grievance, DOH be instituted as the way to travel - they might have to keep the two systems seperate. That way, the company gets it's synergies and the workers don't- sounds grand. Pay vs travel benefits are apples and oranges, one is a major dispute and you know that.700UW said:No one is forcing anything, they are wanting their Collective Bargaining Agreement enforced.
What would you do if WN just said we arent going to match your 401k anymore?
700UW said:The language is what it is, I believe the arbiter is wrong.....
Its not binding arbitration, binding arbitration is for Contract Negotiations.jimntx said:Well, while you are determining that the arbiter is wrong, why not look up the definition of binding arbitration., or get an adult to explain it to you. At this point it doesn't matter whether the arbiter was right, wrong, or a ham sandwich. The binding decision was in favor of the company.