North by Northwest said:When will it END...AFA please put the poor beast out of it's misery.
[post="279744"][/post]
With friends like you, who needs enemies
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
North by Northwest said:When will it END...AFA please put the poor beast out of it's misery.
[post="279744"][/post]
There isn't a line if there is CHAOS, and IF there's CHAOS, there may not be an airline to Scab at.AC AA LA FA said:dispite all thats been said....if there is CHAOS and you cross your a slime ball SCAB and thats all there is to it...
[post="280161"][/post]
Nothing happened because the AFA's lawyers know that the union has no legal basis to strike, and those lawyers have warned the union leadership accordingly. This is because the United/PBGC agreement (according to a document filed by the carrier with the SEC) was structured in a way that had the PBGC, and not United, terminate the pension plans, which the PBGC can do under the applicable Federal laws. Since the AFA's contract with United was (and still is) subject to all governmental actions under Federal laws, there was no change in, nor breach of, its contract by United. And under the RLA, that prevents the AFA from striking, whether using "Chaos" tactics or anything else. Thus, all of the AFA press releases about potential strikes or "Chaos" actions stemming from the PBGC's takeover of the AFA pension plan are nothing more than noise, designed only to mislead potential United passengers and confuse the union's membership into thinking that the AFA is "doing something" when, in reality, it has no leverage whatsoever with United.Beer Guzzler said:The UA AFA had all this hype about chaos strikes over the 4th weekend and nothing happened...
Cosmo said:Nothing happened because the AFA's lawyers know that the union has no legal basis to strike, and those lawyers have warned the union leadership accordingly. This is because the United/PBGC agreement (according to a document filed by the carrier with the SEC) was structured in a way that had the PBGC, and not United, terminate the pension plans, which the PBGC can do under the applicable Federal laws. Since the AFA's contract with United was (and still is) subject to all governmental actions under Federal laws, there was no change in, nor breach of, its contract by United. And under the RLA, that prevents the AFA from striking, whether using "Chaos" tactics or anything else. Thus, all of the AFA press releases about potential strikes or "Chaos" actions stemming from the PBGC's takeover of the AFA pension plan are nothing more than noise, designed only to mislead potential United passengers and confuse the union's membership into thinking that the AFA is "doing something" when, in reality, it has no leverage whatsoever with United.
[post="280510"][/post]