WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,662
- Banned
- #46
no, you think I am slamming AA for everything it does.
I have said for some time that AA needs to reduce its capacity... that is what they are doing to Europe during the winter and to Latin America. where did I say those things are not financially positive moves?
and it still doesn't change that this topic is about an additional commercial airport which a developer wants but the community does not. DL can side one way or the other but the project will be killed by the people in that community.
and I have also not said that WN's restructuring of its network is a bad thing... just that they are not fulfilling their promise to be something significant in the ATL market. WN has raised fares in many ATL markets so that it is now carrying fewer passengers but getting higher total revenue which is good for DL.
ATL is turning out to be very good for both DL and WN; fares are higher while passengers are up slightly but generally in DL's favor.
I have said for some time that AA needs to reduce its capacity... that is what they are doing to Europe during the winter and to Latin America. where did I say those things are not financially positive moves?
and it still doesn't change that this topic is about an additional commercial airport which a developer wants but the community does not. DL can side one way or the other but the project will be killed by the people in that community.
and I have also not said that WN's restructuring of its network is a bad thing... just that they are not fulfilling their promise to be something significant in the ATL market. WN has raised fares in many ATL markets so that it is now carrying fewer passengers but getting higher total revenue which is good for DL.
ATL is turning out to be very good for both DL and WN; fares are higher while passengers are up slightly but generally in DL's favor.