OMG,

skimmed over the damn question a-gain!
Lakefield and Crellin received new stock options in the NEW U, Labor did not even though we had the language for the stock options to receive.
What are you some dense board....the judge dumped over $2 billion in pensions, ruled on a hefty 21% immediate emergency pay cut (1113e) (3rd wage cut for labor).We already had the stock provisions, the investors said no, or no investment money. They wanted the lions shares of stock. So, our legal told us that the judge will move to make sure the company can emerge from bk, and we would lose that stock language no matter what.
The provisions in our ratified agreements of 2004 said that labor could have the choice of stock options or profit sharing once the company emerged from BK.
THAT DID NOT HAPPEN. Once the company got the investors together, they would not allow those provisions for labor.
So, I will ask again for your source in management, WHY was labor not permitted stock accorrding to their concession amount to receive in stock options???
BTW, LABOR WAS CONSIDERED 'UNSECURED CREDITORS'; THAT'S WHY I WAS ON THE COMMITTEE, EVERY MEETING AND EVERY CONFERENCE CALL!!!!!! Labor, as UNSECURED CREDITORS got zip!
You should not attempt to debate which you know nothing about! Stop being the mouth piece for management. Let them come on here and debate it if they care enough on what is said.