that is almost the same letter they sent out to the 141, then a few hours later came the T/A... and it had an extended date. It reminds me of the IBT's assertion to force the company into new contract talks, someone on here( i won't mention the name) kept saying that the contract could not be changed, that the west had to take the east contract etc.. now with this letter is it not saying they are changing the contract
How about this, since the US Airways deal with the BK court supposedly can not be changed, go forward with negotiations for the west and get a better new contract, wait until 2009 for the east and give them the new contract, after all the west has been in amendable staus since oct o 2003, anything now will keep them from having any real contract improvements until 2012 or longer.......
Lastly, how do you tell when the IAM is lying to you.........
( if you don't know then here it is... look for their lips moving)