robbedagain
Veteran
- Oct 13, 2003
- 11,125
- 2,676
Just cuz they "signed their way away" for what 10 yrs something cld change and they cld make a come back.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
uh, AA is the carrier that signed away its right to serve DAL.Seriously saying they will be larger than at an airport the DOJ is preventing to fly at is even more idiotic
WN 89.10%
VX 7.15%
DL 2.35%
UA 1.33%
K5 0.09%
That is what I have been trying to tell him for months.700UW said:Did DL get any assets that AA had to divest?
That would be a big NO!
And the DOJ even told DL not to even bother and bid, so the only way DL is at DAL and can stay at DAL is at the mercy of the other airlines who actually own or lease the gates.
DL started DAL service first with large RJs in part because DAL opened to larger aircraft in the middle of Oct.What's funny is that AA is probably making more money off the deal as a landlord than DL will as a carrier.
Using the excuse for "they only just started mainline" is a weak, weak, ploy, WT. You've maintained for eons about how DL has maintained a dominating position between the Metromess and DL's hubs, and how DAL was the preferred airport for the wealthy.
When the November stats finally get published, here's the relative seat share for all five carriers.
What's obvious is that VX may be larger in terms of boardings, but is operating at a horrendous load factors deficit compared to everyone else... I give it a year before they are back at DFW.Code:WN 89.10% VX 7.15% DL 2.35% UA 1.33% K5 0.09%
The little voices inside that widget brain.eolesen said:Who ever said AA was making money off of DL?
100% correct E. I have said this long ago. Just like Virgin is paying more for their gates due to the sublease, so is Delta for subleasing gates from UAL and/or SWA third party subleases. I said this back when the subleases were announced that any airline subleasing a gate at DAL LF from another carrier, that actually owns said gates will in fact pay alot more as all know the gates are limited as far as access is concerned. I too believe Delta is operating at a bigger loss at LF than they would have, IF they would have won the 2 gates givin up by AA. I also believe they could very possibly move their operations from LF to DFW, as others have said here. Bottom line is VX is in fact paying more to lease said gates from AA than they would if they were the sole owners of the 2 gates. As well, Delta is paying more for their one gate semi lease than they would if they were the direct owner and leasing from Dallas. Great point E, but I tried and tried to explain this long ago, and WT said that it was never happening as I said it was, and it actually is. Gee, wonder why...eolesen said:Who ever said AA was making money off of DL?
No idea what VX is paying AA to sublease, but I'm sure "fair market rate" is well above what AA's costs are as a signatory leaseholder, and likewise for whatever UA is charging DL.
DL may be operating more seats, but the question still remains if it's profitable. Chances are high they're just diluting their DFW-ATL flights.
Whatever, WT. You've clearly never dealt with leases. I have, and there's no way anyone is paying less than market rates for that gate space.WorldTraveler said:You really have no factual information to support the notion that VX or DL are paying above market for.leases, that DL is diluting its DFW flights, or that they aren't profitable, do you?