My inference to ‘it’ as in the decision to accept the court decision not to CHAOS/Strike, or whatever.
I am not sure what you mean by "accepting" the decision. I imagine AFA is examinging its legal alternatives.
In any case, if you are suggesting they should go ahead with CHAOS despite the injunction, I disagree and I would call deciding to not disobey a court order and thereby avoid getting thrown in jail or fined in contempt to be mostly a matter of simple common sense on the part of union leadership and sound legal advice, rather than simply a "business" decision.
The reason for the word ‘business’ being in large letters is to emphasize that the decision not to pursue other legal alternatives (it) is based on an entirely business decision to protect the income of the AFA which may not be in the best interest of the membership and not in the interest of unionism.
Ah, I see. So you are saying it would be more in the interest of the membership to risk a fine for contempt that may have to be paid with union dues?
What a great ‘business’ that you are running.
Sorry, I am not "running" AFA. I have nothing to do with AFA.
Did you inform your new NWA FAs of your concern in your business meating, or did you give them the sweat talking rhetoric that is most common with liars?
"Meating"? Is that like "steak-ing" or "chicken-ing"? And "sweat-talking"? Do you mean "meeting" and "sweet talking"?
😛
Even if it does, I still don't understand what you are getting at.
Unions in this country are dying JMHO mainly because you treat your membership as ignorant lemmings.
Unions are dying for many reasons. It is true that one of those reasons is that the membership is largely made up of ignorant lemmings -- but that only reflects the population at large. (And who is this "you" you keep referring to? I have nothing to do with running a union.)
Didnt the AFA want to represent NW f/a's? And wasnt this situation fullblown when they took over as their union? They knew what they were getting and they should have been better prepared for this. They should have dues and strike funds ready to support the f/a's thru this. The others that they represent should be shaking in their boots watching how this is going down.
I don't follow. If a court says, "Don't do this at this time or you'll be in deep doo-doo," you don't do it. Your anger about a court decision should be directed at the court, not at AFA.
A union can be as prepared as it wants to be, and have a massive strike fund, but if a judge enjoins the union from striking, the union doesn't strike (unless the union wants to risk a fine to be paid by dues and the union leaders want to risk being personally fined and spending time in jail).