PITbull
Veteran
- Dec 29, 2002
- 7,784
- 456
US,
I am not saying we need Gangwal back. I am just defending what I know to be true. He's not coming back. So, when I hear folks place blame who really don't know or never worked with him or for U, then I need to speak about it.
I can say that Gangwal was here in the best of times also. And we all benefited from those times, no denying and we shouldn't forget. Because Gangwal never participated in stripping employees of everything to turn a dime, does not make him a weak or inept CEO. Keep in mind, he too, had Board members who called the shots. He implemented what the Baord agreed to and presented.
What we don't need here is the type of present management that is here. This management states they have vision, but in action, all we do is run from the competition. Management continues to violate the contracts, discipline folks to the point of terminations on full speed. And, disregard our customers by not focusing on quality of service, specifically when irregular operations occur, which is probably daily somewhere. Face the facts, we do not have a management team on any level that inspires their employees by servicing the employees who then, in return, service the customers. It all should go hand in hand and flow with the kind of synergistic team work that many corporations have, when the right folks are in place.
Any one can have a "plan" or a so called vision of success. In business, however, You need the right folks in the right seat to drive the bus in the right direction.
As an employee of U, I don't know what direction we are going. No clue.
I am not saying we need Gangwal back. I am just defending what I know to be true. He's not coming back. So, when I hear folks place blame who really don't know or never worked with him or for U, then I need to speak about it.
I can say that Gangwal was here in the best of times also. And we all benefited from those times, no denying and we shouldn't forget. Because Gangwal never participated in stripping employees of everything to turn a dime, does not make him a weak or inept CEO. Keep in mind, he too, had Board members who called the shots. He implemented what the Baord agreed to and presented.
What we don't need here is the type of present management that is here. This management states they have vision, but in action, all we do is run from the competition. Management continues to violate the contracts, discipline folks to the point of terminations on full speed. And, disregard our customers by not focusing on quality of service, specifically when irregular operations occur, which is probably daily somewhere. Face the facts, we do not have a management team on any level that inspires their employees by servicing the employees who then, in return, service the customers. It all should go hand in hand and flow with the kind of synergistic team work that many corporations have, when the right folks are in place.
Any one can have a "plan" or a so called vision of success. In business, however, You need the right folks in the right seat to drive the bus in the right direction.
As an employee of U, I don't know what direction we are going. No clue.