ClueByFour
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 3,566
- 37
USA320Pilot said:No, not at all because the fundamentals have changed. Explosive LCC growth with capital market support, more internet booking, increased security costs, and energy prices have caused the business plan problem. The new labor standard is being established by the LCC’s and either US Airways and its union’s adapt, either via imposition or consensual new labor accords, or the airline will likely fail.
[post="190666"][/post]
Please stop making this stuff up.
With the exception of the energy cost, every single one of those factors was well known (apparently to everyone except CCY). In fact, with the exception of the security costs, each of the other things (LCC growth w/capital support, internet booking) have been clear for years. Before 9/11, even.
However, with labor contract imposition and new ATSB agreement expected in short order, the cuts and continued government backed financing could be approved by the court no later than Friday. I suspect these developments, plus ALPA TA ratification next Friday, will put significant pressure on the AFA, IAM, and CWA to obtain new labor deals.
Wishfull thinking. The CWA and AFA will be able to find work that pays as well as the post-concession rate from US, and the IAM-M members can probably find better paying positions. The only reason that ALPA is bending over again is because pilots cannot replace $150k in today's environment (in any great numbers, and this assumes that the T/A is actually ratified). The IAM-M can (and probably will) shut the place down, and there is absolutely nothing that ALPA can do about it (witness Pollack today--I wonder why we can't outsource A320 flying to Mesa--same quality).