Gilding the Lily
Veteran
- Oct 30, 2006
- 1,466
- 2
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #31
I applaud someone trying to 'walk the path'. I do have issues when, in the course of their walk, they try to push their beliefs on a nation.
I think you both have some good points. I do believe, as Dell put it, that those trying to "walk the path" are held to a different level of accountability than those who do not pronounce their faith and use it as a basis of their politics. Do you think it should be different Dell? I would hope that those who are using their faith as a basis of their political beliefs would be more than willing to be held to a higher standard. Isn't that what 2 Peter 2 is all about?
Its one of those "see the speck in your brother’s eye, but fail to see the beam of wood in your own" type of deals.
I have found that people's personal faiths are more accepted when those people simply say this is what faith has done in my life... rather than my faith is what compels me to tell you to always change YOUR life. And there is no better way to show how faith has changed a person's life than to show it by their own actions. Hypocritical behavior in a bathroom is not one of those actions.
It is not a bad thing to have politicians' political views shaped by their religious beliefs; our forefathers' political beliefs were shaped, in part, by religion.
It is high-time, however, for these types of politicians to be known for what they are for, rather than being always known for what they are against!!