----------------
On 5/15/2003 11:16:42 AM FWAAA wrote:
We obviously disagree about the number of APA-represented AA pilots will choose to fly a 50 seat RJ. You fear that many will, I predict: hardly any.
So instead of having the right to fly 67 50 seaters, now you'll probably have about 600 of them. People can argue all day about how many displaced AA pilots will choose to fly them.
Concessions suck. Everybody gave up something (even the lowly ALPA Eagle pilots).
But the concessions are in place, and now it's time to move on and turn things around. THEN, everybody can get back what's theirs.
----------------
Yes indeed. The APA in 1987 showed just how interested they were in regional and short haul flying. After 16 years, that flying is looking pretty good, compared to no flying. Ah yes, the ugly fickle head of the APA raises just in time to see the sun set. Pathetic.On 5/15/2003 11:16:42 AM FWAAA wrote:
We obviously disagree about the number of APA-represented AA pilots will choose to fly a 50 seat RJ. You fear that many will, I predict: hardly any.
So instead of having the right to fly 67 50 seaters, now you'll probably have about 600 of them. People can argue all day about how many displaced AA pilots will choose to fly them.
Concessions suck. Everybody gave up something (even the lowly ALPA Eagle pilots).
But the concessions are in place, and now it's time to move on and turn things around. THEN, everybody can get back what's theirs.
----------------
