But he wants 5 years. Although we had 6.5-7 yrs.Contract has been amendable for 10 months, not 5 years.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But he wants 5 years. Although we had 6.5-7 yrs.Contract has been amendable for 10 months, not 5 years.
Snap backs after out of BK for a certain time frame and back to making profits again for the company, as well as others I do believe.
Almost the same letter we got at SWA about our "relationship" between management and the mechanics. All about the safety. The letter to us was much more severe. But the same intent.
Odd to sit here and watch the exact same playbook play out at AA as it did at SWA.
Oh I hear ya. Most people only look at the $$$. This time around it was mostly scope and full retro at the top of the list. Once they went over the usual 2 years, it was full retro and scope tied for 1st place. We saw SWA was going to purposely drag ours out for a minimum 5 years as said by the co. nego team after GK said it also.SWA was touted as a successful campaign to emulate. They only talked about the money, not the added foreign maintenance language.
Seems the leadership is very good at picking out the good and ignoring the unfavorable.
TRO or PRO. What does it really matter ? There was and isn't any concerted effort by the unions to disrupt operations! Every AMT could work all the OT the company offers, drink 15 redbulls to work at 150% of his capabilities , and have a union rep. out on the plane whipping him like a racehorse. It still wouldn't fix the operational problems that AA finds themselves in. The facts are that SMALL MINDED IDEAS FROM A DESERT LLC ALWAYS ON THE BRINK OF BANKRUPTCY DON'T NECESSARILY WORK AT THE WORLD'S LARGEST AIRLINE!!! They are clueless on how to steer the ship. They are lagging their competitors in most all metrics. They have pissed off the vast majority of their employees from all departments with their incompetence and not to mention greed. The kingpins of this company are simply scapegoating the AMT unions for their own inability to properly run the airline in good economic times. Why do you think they filed a bogus lawsuit in a federal courthouse with a track record of siding with AA virtually every time.? Can you say Rubber stamp? Samuelson told Isom how the cow ate the cabbage AFTER AA had already filed suit. People can despise or worship the Association. doesn't matter. Because until the SMALL MINDED people running this outfit either get replaced or pull their heads out of their posteriors , the whole place will remain dysfunctional. Point the finger at the root of the problem first!
The video was from May 21st. The Injunction complaint was filed May 21st.
Getting rid of the CEO worked with Crandall, but then we had to get rid Carty. Eventually we got rid of Carty too, but then we got Arpey. Hey, we got rid of Arpey, as well. Then we got and had to get rid of Horton. Luckily, he was gone fast but now we have to get rid of Parker & Isom. To be continued...
I think you overestimate the twu’s role in CEO replacement. Only Carty was removed because of poor relationships with unions and probably was really replaced because of the bone headed TWA purchase. I don’t think the executives or BOD, care about employees. This isn’t delta
I actually think the employees are for the most part very good a seeing what are bad ideas because of our daily view of the operation.
For instance the TWA purchase. And of course Samuelson threatening Isom in public and posting to YouTube, we all saw that as a mistake and we would be put on the back burner.
Not one member said the association was going to be a great idea.
I think you overestimate the twu’s role in CEO replacement. Only Carty was removed because of poor relationships with unions and probably was really replaced because of the bone headed TWA purchase. I don’t think the executives or BOD, care about employees. This isn’t delta
I actually think the employees are for the most part very good a seeing what are bad ideas because of our daily view of the operation.
For instance the TWA purchase. And of course Samuelson threatening Isom in public and posting to YouTube, we all saw that as a mistake and we would be put on the back burner.
Not one member said the association was going to be a great idea.
May 21st , May 21st! Nice subterfuge. I reiterate that AA had already filed the suit before Samuelson ever told Isom how the cow ate the cabbage (pointing out within the confines of the RLA). If you have proof and not conjecture please supply us with it. If not then please explain your reasoning in trying to aide AA in painting my workgroup as engaging in an illegal job action. Hurt feelings that lil Jimmy left you and Phat Don to unsuccessfully fend for yourselves?The video was from May 21st. The Injunction complaint was filed May 21st.
Getting rid of the CEO worked with Crandall, but then we had to get rid Carty. Eventually we got rid of Carty too, but then we got Arpey. Hey, we got rid of Arpey, as well. Then we got and had to get rid of Horton. Luckily, he was gone fast but now we have to get rid of Parker & Isom. To be continued...
Contract has been amendable for 10 months, not 5 years.