B737 driver
Veteran
- Jul 6, 2017
- 3,381
- 209
This is the same thing the Democratic party does. Say they are for the working man, but tax people that work to death. Then turn around and give it to people who won't work.P. REZ and 1986Mekanic I am going to excuse myself from this conversation for two reasons.
1. I don't want this back and forth to derail the thread so I am terminating it now.
2. There is no challenge pointing out two obvious examples of stupidity and mental conditioning and the entertainment value of it is wearing thin.
I will close by saying it is sad you two choose to live in a propaganda fueled fantasy world playing the part of the pawn for someone else's agenda instead of recognizing that you are being taken advantage of by those that would sacrifice your future and the standard of living for future generations for their own enrichment and political power.
When your UNION, who's primary purpose is to better your compensation and working conditions, starts prioritizing headcount over the memberships standard of living that is a problem.
Let me introduce you to an old saying.
Taxation without representation: a phrase, generally attributed to James Otis about 1761, that reflected the resentment of American colonists at being taxed by a British Parliament to which they elected no representatives.
This game the Association (the international) is playing is nothing new. It is a game the rich and powerful have always played, to put themselves out of reach of reprisal or reproach.
Accepting unelected representation is about an anti American as it gets. The fact the UNION utilizes this type of government while claiming to represent the working man is nothing less than appalling.