That’s a good point, but I don’t think that aircraft movement is part of an AMT scope as FSCs do aircraft movements at small stations.I don't think they can just arbitrarily change scope mid contract by moving current and historical work to another work group. I would also think that since we are all in the same union that the T3 leadership would be against the migration of higher paying T1 jobs to lower paying T3 jobs. To me that should be a given and if its not,, then maybe its a "Houston we have a problem" moment?
Would ramp doing aircraft movements be considered outsourcing by AA and the union as we are all part of the same association with a contract negotiated together with ramp and all other ground employees?
I think why we do aircraft movements at big stations is because we are more efficient at it, I wouldn’t be concerned with losing it because it doesn’t seem like AA has been too successful at hiring and retaining FSCs. Why would you work for AA when they can work at any other airline with a much better contract. It’s like mechs in the 90s we had our choice, or an OH AMT living in OKC they have several options to choose from.
Last edited: