Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Easton is hated by most in Tulsa. Of course I'm sure they could bring a US Air guy in who could be worse. We'll see but I'm betting it will be a US Air guy.I just heard another LAA maintenance Director (Mark Easton) is being shown the door, although
I have no opinion on him it seems like another step in the wrong direction as far as LAA AMT's
are concerned.
Absolute conflict of interest having both groups in same union add Envoy to that too. Strength in numbers might have worked when we were able to strike but that argument is gone foreverAgreed. As far as I'm concerned when aircraft moves are shifted to fleet, that's a loss of mechanic work. I consider it outsourced work. Now I know the twu will not see it that way. As always, all they care about are dues.
Vortilon these are comments I read constantly here on Forums that I've never seen one shread of proof on? And I'm not at all saying that maybe you aren't 100% correct and at many times the "people" in the TWU have screwed all of us to some degree?
But just for once instead of using the acronym can I read the "names" of the people you claim screwed you?
Who were these people and how far back in time do they go? Where are these people today? Were there also voted in Local Presidents who screwed you?
If it's the people who were around in 1983 you're going to bring up again, that was 34 years ago. Do we have to assume that anyone who reaches the International heights is automatically going to also maybe be a S bag?
Ed Kosiatek, Jim Little, Bobby Gless, Don Videtich, and there are more like all of local 514's past presidents. Hope that helps, there are more. I find that regardless of the name changes, the results are always the same. The method to get the International's desired outcome is pretty predictable. The current pace of negotiations for example, this is scripted, and the International is just fine with it.
Thanks Vortilon. I'm not much up on things that people think Ed Kosiatek did to them and the people he worked with at that time? But I have learned more over time IMO both the good and bad of the other three. Do you have any hope/expectations for anything different with Lombardo at the helm? Have you noticed anything you can think of where he might be headed in the right direction? And yes I did notice that you said you think this is all just scripted (could be)
The 514 Presidents I think were just doing whatever they could to protect their members and keep them working. That's what they're voted in to do and I expect Danker of course is continuing to do that.
What do you think of President Peterson? Do you think Lombardo would except and try to pass on to you something that he didn't support? And do you think he would then try to sell it to you? He doesn't strike me as that type personally.
Have you ever met or spoken to Harry Lombardo, Alex Garcia or Mike Mays? Personally I've known Alex since 2003 and "I" trust the guy, met Mike once and have talked to him a few times, and only met Harry himself once.
I expect the International members to act in the best interests of the International, which is usually not in line with the Line AMTs in the membership. I expect them to ask us to accept less to maintain the headcount in overhaul to maintain dues payers or $$. They are hoping we forgot what happened the last few times we did that, the heads were chopped anyway. Oh and no tax write off for our charitable contribution for the sacrifice. Lombardo doesn't get to DFW much - one time IIRC about 3 or 4 years ago. I think Gary Peterson understands what is important to the people he represents, and is doing as much as he can. Unfortunately, he is bogged down with having to deal with all the other work groups issues as well. This is where, if we just had our own union - the focus would be on issues that concerned AMTs.
Does anybody know who approves membership into the Facebook group American Airlines Twu/IAM Amt's? It's been close to a week since I've requested to join.
That's what I'm sort of thinking. They only have around 250 members.Sometimes guys who make these Group pages lose interest and abandon them. I've seen quite a few Group pages dry up because no one was keeping up the role of being an admin.
That's what I'm sort of thinking. They only have around 250 members.
There are 4 admins listed on the home page. Maybe you can message them and they will see it? Looking at their personal pages it appears they don't post much, at least not publicly. If it helps, I sent a request a week or so ago too with no response.Does anybody know who approves membership into the Facebook group American Airlines Twu/IAM Amt's? It's been close to a week since I've requested to join.
Because guys like you meddle in our affairs and ends up corrupting the discussions.In Fleet we have 3 active running pages that all have over 1000 members. One has almost 2000. But to be honest it's usually the same people on all three who make comments. Not a high degree of participation but I do know that there are many people who just read cause they come up to me on the Ramp.
I really don't understand frankly why there doesn't seem to be a good Mechanic Group page out there?
Because guys like you meddle in our affairs and ends up corrupting the discussions.