Where to begin? Nearly everything you posted above is incorrect. The most hilarious part is when you talked about the differences between your math and "your article states" (referring to the Southwest Airlines press release quoted and linked by your co-worker, WNMECH).swamt said:I come with a different number than what your article states. I took 152,000,000 (Q1-2014) X 298% and came up with 452,960,000 mil. It is just shy of tripling the profits which would be a 300% increase. But either way we look at it it is still a fantastic Q1 and more profit sharing for all to enjoy.
Another way is to take 453,000,000 divided by 152,000,000 = 2.98 move 2 positions to convert to % = 298%.
The press release was written and reviewed by management and is correct. WN's first quarter earnings were 267% larger than a year ago. 267% is almost a quadrupling, not a tripling.
Contrary to your post above, a tripling of profits is not a 300% increase. A 300% increase would be a quadrupling of profits. Look at it this way: when something doubles, that's a 100% increase. When something triples, that's a 200% increase. When something quadruples, that's a 300% increase. You showed your work, but you started off with the wrong 1Q2014 figure of $152 million, which includes special items. Your employer used the better Q1 number of $124 million from last year, and that's the one that EXCLUDES special items.
And yes, the first quarter profits were almost quadruple the year-ago Q1 profits, and the 267% increase is correct.
All in all, a great first quarter. Fuel costs were down by about $432 million (economic cost, excluding paper mark to market gains or losses on future hedges). If fuel costs stay level for the rest of the year, WN should spend about $1.7 billion less on fuel this year compared to last year.