B737 driver
Veteran
- Jul 6, 2017
- 3,381
- 209
Birdman what is the purpose of LOA2 is believe covering those Dallas postions, is that because the 300's are gone. Because I remember in AMFA updates they said the company agreed to the 2.75 & it was T/A ed in negotiations. I see the 4 th C Check line made it into Scope Article 2, which was in the original LOA 2, from the 2008 agreement, which we reached when we bought Airtran. Which we won in Arbitration. Is it your and Swampy opinion that the 2.75 is protected by if they try to contract anything out, and do a reduction in force, that works comes back, which would protect our ratios?However I know you can never Assume language.The 2.75 minimum in LOA 1 is no more and I haven’t seen it reprinted anywhere else. The only job security I’ve found so far is the old language in Scope Article 2(3). “The company will not contract out work when such contracting out results, or will result, in a reduction in force for any employee covered by this agreement.”
Granted we are well above 2.75 now but through attrition could go well below.