WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,662
- Banned
- #46
obviously DL doesn't seem the insourcing they do as unprofitable... in fact they have said many times that Tech Ops insourcing generates some of the highest profit margins in the business.WT,
AA has made a management decision not to do third party work....They never wanted it.... goes way back to FEDX days in
Tulsa. Management simply told FEDX to get their #### out now..... we dont want it here!!! They made a half ass attempt at the Delta hgr,but set it up to fail.... Why is Delta doing it now if its so unprofitable? We have so much talent going to waste here it's almost sickening....
In short, DL sees the maintenance operation they have as a source of revenue and not just as a cost center - which is apparently the only way AA apparently sees maintenance.
I thought AA did quite a bit of insourcing not that long ago. Not sure of the timeframes you are talking about but others have said AA did do a fair amount of insourcing.....probably more than UA.
.
Again, the question is why AA labor can't figure out how to make the assets AA has - including AA people - work to the benefit of the company AND labor. Other companies can figure out how to do it.
.
Doesn't matter what organization you are working in, if the intent is solely to look out for your own interests, the organization will ultimately fail.