BoeingBoy
Veteran
- Nov 9, 2003
- 16,512
- 5,865
- Banned
- #46
From a maintenance/parts standpoint, it's definitely going to be a different type from the A330.
From a pilot/fleet type standpoint, it's too early to tell whether the FAA will grant a common type rating for the A330/350. Even if they do, there's the possibility that the airlines will keep them separate pilot-wise, ala the 737-200/300 or DC9/MD80. Of course, there would still be training savings from only having to do some sort of differences or transition training instead of a full initial for pilots moving between the two - at least judging from Airbus' remarks.
One interesting tidbit from the A350 order documents - the "hypothetical" city pairs used to specify minimum useful load and maximum fuel burn were PHL-TLV, PHL-NRT, PHX-NRT, and PHX-FRA.
Jim
From a pilot/fleet type standpoint, it's too early to tell whether the FAA will grant a common type rating for the A330/350. Even if they do, there's the possibility that the airlines will keep them separate pilot-wise, ala the 737-200/300 or DC9/MD80. Of course, there would still be training savings from only having to do some sort of differences or transition training instead of a full initial for pilots moving between the two - at least judging from Airbus' remarks.
One interesting tidbit from the A350 order documents - the "hypothetical" city pairs used to specify minimum useful load and maximum fuel burn were PHL-TLV, PHL-NRT, PHX-NRT, and PHX-FRA.
Jim