CallawayGolf
Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2009
- Messages
- 1,920
- Reaction score
- 1,961
Well I would love to see how many employers would voluntarily submit to collective bargaining without a federal mandate to force the situation on them. Some may, but my best guess is that most organized labor would be quickly dismissed in the free market. Either way let the labor and employer free choices reign rather than the pernicious interference of federal or state government. The nation's economy and jobless rate would be exponentially better in a true free-market environment.I'm going to respectfully decline to answer except for my comments below. My negative feelings on ObamaCare would over load the server.
Individual Liberty comes from our creator. No government can confer these fundamental human rights. Among these rights is the right to freely associate with others of like mind and to organize to further their common interests. I have long argued that the single biggest enemy of Organized Labor was FDR and all of the laws that you allude to and their subsequent regulations. A free market is just that and when Government meddles with the relationship between Labor and Management precious little good comes from it for either side. All of the items you mention in your first paragraph are issues to be negotiated between company and labor without government intervention. However you cannot deny history that right or wrong the Labor movement gave us the lifestyle we enjoy today.
There are many examples like the one you posted. You cannot blame organized Labor IMO for the subsequent actions of Government. FDR was if nothing else a master politician. Like the current Empty Suit he needed money to get re-elected. Big Business had it, labor was getting the upper hand and he put a stop to that quick fast and in a hurry. Same with Social Security, a brilliant election year ploy. Take an obscenely small percentage of a persons wages in exchange for a pension. They made the retirement age 65 in a country where the average life expectancy was 55. Total Scam at the time. Over time the scam worked right up until the Baby Boomers started to retire and the life expectancy went to about 77, so now we are upside down on the largest social program we have. All because we traded a little bit of economic freedom for a little bit of economic security and got neither.
I fully concur on the Social Security disaster that came out of FDR and the 1930's. Back then the annual maximum contribution was $60. If it had remained capped at $60 I would still consider it unconstitutional but at least the burden would be more than manageable. BTW, Medicare & Medicaid programs have now surpassed Social Security as the top federal expenditure and the top unfunded liability. SS unfunded liability is "only" $15 trillion versus more than $100 trillion for Medicare, Medicaid and prescription drugs. Can you spell i-n-s-o-l-v-e-n-c-y?