A320Driver
Member
- May 20, 2007
- 16
- 0
US Airways ALPA PHL Council 41 Update - June 4, 2007
Why the List Can’t Be Fixed
Dear Philadelphia Pilots,
For those of you present at Herndon on May 21, 2007 that heard our Chairman, Jack Stephan, tell you and Captain Prater that we were not interested in fixing this list. You now need to know why your PHL Reps really do mean-it; the Nicolau “Award†can’t be fixed!
Numerous assumptions by the Arbitrator to build the list were base on fallacy. Obvious tenets of ALPA Merger policy were not applied by the Arbitrator as describe in our Presentation to the Executive Council of ALPA National. Mainly, and above all else the lack of application of avoiding windfalls at the expense of the other groups was completely missed. There was no test applied to the finished list as described to us by our pilot neutral. In addition the following items (to name a few) render the list un-repairable:
1. The lack of consideration for attrition brought to the merger by the AAA pilots. (4 to 1 ratio of attrition)
Wrong. See page 26-27 ALPA Arbitration Award
2. The MDA pilots being considered not active pilots at time of announced Merger. Arbitrator failed to recognize our certified list.
See page 20-21 The ALPA Arbitration Award
3. No active time applied for any furloughed pilots.
Still get longevity pay and recall rights.
4. No consideration of staffing formula differences between the two airlines. US Airways currently has fewer pilots per aircraft working more hours causing a discrepancy in equipment ratios that harms the US Airways pilots.
Wrong. See page 24-25 The ALPA Arbitration Award
5. The lack of disclosure of impending Bankruptcy filing of AWA under a plan called Project Zanzibar.
Didn't matter. See page 24-25 The ALPA Arbitration Award
6. Procedural errors in the Arbitration process.
Say What?
Any fix that is attempted would have to be tested against the next Merger or Consolidation. All of this leads to a broken list that can’t be fixed.
ALPA has but one choice, and that is to do the right thing and set this list aside. At that point, we can then consider the next steps to the process. Until that action is taken by National, we are not in a position to best represent out pilots in a fair and equitable manner.
All these items were addressed. You may not like how he ruled, but he did give all these items consideration. He found his best version of balance given all the evidence presented.
Have you read the reasoning behind the award?