Just found this on another board...
My "personal favorite" line is in bold. So there ya have it kids ....
Calculating the Bottom 300 and Potential Furloughs After the VLOA Awards
AFA has received many calls from Flight Attendants wanting clarification on how the Company determined the furlough numbers. US Airways management has said that there are three issues relating to their decision. First is the decrease in attrition, which is the number of flight attendants that quit the Company in any given month. Second, is the increase in the number of flight attendants who need to fly more hours in the month due to the economy. (ie...so the rest of you can just lose your job! REMEMBER THIS IS YOUR UNION THAT SENT THIS NOTE TO YOU!!!) Finally, the Company stated that while there was a 41% pulldown in Las Vegas flying last summer, the flight attendant staffing in Phoenix was not reduced equally. Almost (if not) ALL flying out of LAS is staffed by PHX. LAS should NOT even be considered because it is strictly a RSV base and they get ... at the most .... 5 hrs block total flying time. They NEVER used LAS Rsvs unless ABSOULTELY necessary. I worked LAS Rsv and never once flew a trip in 6 months.
The following is a calculation on how the Company determined the bottom 300 and potential furloughs after the VLOA Awards:
1. The Company offered two types of Voluntary Leaves Of Absence: 150 4-Month VLOA's and 150 16-Month VLOA's
2. The Company calculated that they were overstaffed by 300 Active Flight Attendants and would need to potentially furlough 300 Active Flight Attendants.
3. Of the 300 Flight Attendants at the bottom of the seniority list, 14 FA's are on a Leaves of Absence (Medical, Maternity, etc.) and therefore were not active. As a result, the Company subtracted those 14 slots resulting in a total of 314 Flight Attendants to be potentially furloughed (300 Active and 14 Inactive).
After the VLOA's were awarded, it was determined that:
36 Flight Attendants senior to the possible 314 Furloughs took the 4-month leave. This is 114 short of the 150 the Company had requested.
80 Flight Attendants senior to the possible 314 Furloughs took the 16-month leave. This is 70 short of the 150 the Company had requested.
When you add the 114 four-month leaves short of the requirement and the 70 sixteen-month leaves short of the requirement the result is 184.
Of the 184 Active most junior Flight Attendants, 10 Are Inactive and do not count towards the total 184. Therefore, the number increases by 10 to 194 total flight attendants from the most junior 300 flight attendants.
4. To calculate the amount of Flight Attendants saved from Furlough, you then take the 314 Possible Furloughs and Subtract 184 Flight Attendants plus the 10 inactive Flight Attendants.
- This gives a total of 120 Flight Attendants that are SAVED from Furlough, while 194 Flight Attendants have the potential of being Furloughed.
- 194(Furloughed) + 120(Saved) = 314 Total Flight Attendants
Equation:
314 Potential Furloughs(300 Active and 14 Inactive)
150 4 Month Leave
- 36 Leaves Taken
= 114 Furloughs
150 16 Month Leave
- 80 Leaves Taken
= 70 Furloughs
114 Active Furloughs + 70 Active Furloughs + 10 Inactive Furloughs = 194 Total Furloughs
314 Potential Furloughs
- 194 Total Furloughs
= 120 Flight Attendants Saved
194 Total Furloughs
+ 120 Flight Attendants Saved
= 314 Potential Furloughs
Conclusion: 194 Total Furloughs & 120 Saved Flight Attendants
I don't know who's union is worse East or West,
Irrespective, I am truly sorry for those that are facing furlough. I know what you are going through... Got a couple of T-shirts!
OTOH ... You may want to ask yourself ... Is your Union working in the best interest of you? or your company. You decide. G'nite all! I have Airport Appreciation 2morrow
Ps. If you can figure out their fuzzy Math you should go out and get a better higer paying job!