WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,662
- Banned
- #16
THE most excellent Ramp Rat.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I stand corrected the highly exalted Mr. Ramp RatAANOTOK said:30 yrs should a least get me a "Mr." ramp rat
With the IAM involved any number of things can happen.jimntx said:So, Mr. Ramp Rat ( ), now that we know the merger will go forward, please put on your prognostication hat again, and tell us when you think the merger will be completed. I don't mean on paper or with the courts. I mean truly integrated operations of a single airline. After all, 7 years down the road, US East and US West are still (for all practical purposes) operated as two separate airlines with the same name.
I think it will take a minimum of 2-3 years, if not longer. And, I don't see how merging with an even larger airline is going to settle the pilot seniority issue that has been boiling at US all this time. Our unions have not been forthcoming about how this is all going to work out.
Since the US unions are all AFL-CIO affiliates (with the exception of USAPA), and the gold standard for merging two work groups together--regardless of whether it is a merger or a purchase--is Date of Hire, that also opens up the former TWA employees can of worms--particularly with us flight attendants. I just don't see this whole thing as going all that smoothly. What say you?
...and that number is finite...737823 said:With the IAM involved any number of things can happen.
Josh
AANOTOK said:Anyone know what happen to those "emails" that were suppose to bring the merger to it's knees? B)
A. I'm being facetious, and B. But since you asked, it was pointed out pretty strongly that those emails were gold as far as the DOJ having a case. They were discussed by both sides pretrial and obviously they were not so damaging that they would prevent a settlement. That Glenn, was my point.Glenn Quagmire said:
They would have been presented in court had the case not been settled. It is the same with any case that gets settled. What is your point?
I get it now. I think those were a shot across the bow, so to speak.AANOTOK said:A. I'm being facetious, and B. It was pointed out pretty strongly that those emails were gold as far as the DOJ having a case. They were discussed by both sides pretrial and obviously they were not so damaging that they would prevent a settlement. That Glenn, was my point.
"Politics and more"...WorldTraveler said:so the merger is about politics? I thought the Justice dept. was charged with enforcing antitrust law.