Fly:
I have no "ill will" towards United and its great employees. In fact, I am glad our two companies did not merge and that US Airways & America West will combine later this month. The spirit of cooperation between the Arlington & Tempe-based companies is excellent, whether it's management or labor.
The reason I left United was for a "better deal" and the reason I did not want US Airways and United to merge was due to employee sentiment.
It's different between US Airways & America West.
Last Friday America West MEC chairman JR Baker wrote in his letter, "As we discussed the issue internally, we realized that the process (including the seniority integration portion of a merger) was charged with too much emotion, which was severely affecting what should otherwise be a business decision. We decided that we could continue to proceed down the path we were headed (and that history would dictate) that was wrought with failure and exposure should a second merger occur. Instead, we decided to use a little "west coast offense" and arranged a meeting with the combined MECs. We invited Mr. Parker to join us in our plenary session in order to discuss certain issues of importance to the combined pilot group. We thought that if we could put the decision-makers in a room together, absent of the politics and emotion, and reach conceptual agreements on how to proceed, then we would be more successful. It was a long shot, but the MEC decided that it was worth a try."
"I am happy to report to you that I believe the meeting was a success, and that we are well on our way to achieving our goals -- the main ones of which are protecting your pay, benefits and seniority. The transition agreement negotiations have been re-energized and hopefully (with the cooperation of the company), will reach a successful conclusion prior to September 16," he said.
United's problem is that its POR/Disclosure statement predicts annual energy prices over $800 million per year over current prices. That needs to be accounted for. It's my understanding the same thoughts that existed regarding the UCT of carving out a portion of United's domestic system and the Chicago-based airline focusing on long-haul exist today. If United divests of domestic assets, that other airlines desire, like TED, then the company could maintain the breath of its network with expanded domestic code sharing with the new US Airways and large RJ operators, thus preserving revenue and cutting costs.
This cost cutting idea is being executed by US Airways too with more facility, gate, and lease rejections about to be announced.
Thus, United could cut its costs and maintain some of the lost revenue due to asset sales by cutting a deal with Doug Parker and the new US Airways, if necessary.
There is a lot going on right now and it seems as if domestic capacity will come out of the system with GECAS, ILF, and others creating a systematic reduction of legacy carrier domestic flying through the bankruptcy code. That could accelerate in the not-soon-distant future with Delta reportedly filing for its "judicial reorganization" Thursday, Independence Air on the brink of collapse that could become a Chapter 7 liquidation, Northwest expected to file for bankruptcy before mid-October, and United's POR/Disclosure statement reportedly needs more work before it can be confirmed.
How will this unfold? It's to early to tell, but by this time next year the U.S. industry likely will be very different, which is why MEC chairman JR Baker said, "there is a real likelihood (not possibility) that as America West (soon to be US Airways) pilots, we must be prepared and ready to fight a second merger or fragmentation on the heels of this pending merger."
Regards,
USA320Pilot