TWU informer
Veteran
- Nov 4, 2003
- 7,550
- 3,731
No there's not. You are reading the old LOM. There is no cap on the wage adjustment.
already been hashed out and corrected
get up to speed ...overspeed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t miss out on the best deals of the season! Shop now 🎁
No there's not. You are reading the old LOM. There is no cap on the wage adjustment.
IMHO, PTO changed his name to raptorman.
I thought the similarities were compelling as well.
Where is Princess Kadisha when she's needed?
B) xUT
To date, out of all the airlines that filed BK from 2003 until now have brought work back in-house that was outsourced? None. CO had started bringing in more 757 work in-house but who knows what UA will do.You're right; I don't know how much those other airlines spend on outsourced maintenance. But that's irrelevant to my post to Bob Owens to which you responded. I'm confident that those other airlines are spending less on overhaul than they used to spend before they outsourced it. I don't need to do a detailed comparison shopping trip to know that stuff is cheaper at Walmart or Target than it is at Bloomingdales or Neiman Marcus. If insourced overhaul were cheaper, then don't you think that well-run maintenance divisions of UPS, FedEx and others would be doing their own overhaul?
All I have to do is look at their financial statements to see that while they were in bankruptcy, the other airlines slashed their labor costs by a much larger percentage than did AA in 2003 and that when adding in their M&R (parts, materials and outsourced maintenance costs) line item, their labor costs plus M&R is a smaller number per ASM than the same figures at AA. It's been that way for years.
The other day, I posted that in the unlikely event that outsourcing really is more costly, that is AA management's mistake to make, and if outsourcing is more expensive, that's very good for your wages, as that means that airlines will fire the Aeromans and ST Aerospaces of the world and bring overhaul back inhouse, which will apply upward pressure to wages.
To date, out of all the airlines that filed BK from 2003 until now have brought work back in-house that was outsourced? None. CO had started bringing in more 757 work in-house but who knows what UA will do.
I find some of the post funny. Now here is my take, if the offer is voted down most of us hired in the mid 90s will be gone. Those of you left will more than likely be put on the docks, those docks that are left. How many of are going to be able to work in the cargo or the snake pit? Your artist and waist size will get the better of you. Most of the folks in the amt shops are well seasoned meaning aged and some not all could not fit into a fuel tank. Just something to think about. Either way I will be able to find a job. Enjoy!
I was not "promoting" anythiing, I just had a feeling that given the BK threat that we would not get better.
I still fail to understand why everything you want, are, and need that you speak of that and promote them as every one else's needs.
Example
" with the average age 49"
No you are 49 but that is not the average
" there all talk & no action"
That would be you not us
"the next 10 years most of us will be gone"
Not true, you want to be gone and maybe you will, the rest of us will not be able to afford medical because of your yes vote!
"were just going to have to make do as best we can"
Again that is you, the rest of are still fighting for change.
Bottom line, is you need to discern the difference between what you think, believe, need, and want, compared to what reality is and stop pigeon holeing all of us into your nightmare of a life!
You are basically full of crap and wrong on most of your claims.
cow·ard
   [kou-erd] Show IPA
noun
1.
a person who lacks courage in facing danger, difficulty, opposition, pain, etc.; a timid or easily intimidated person.
Most YES voters that I have run across IMO...Nothing in the definition about identity!!
The company will still move you just no 12500So would it be safe to say that about 30-40% of the folks have at least 100k of debt? Out of those folks how would they benefit by voting no and hitting the street? With no moving allowance about half of those would probable file for bankruptcy after a year. That only if they are living pay check to pay check.
Truth be known, we are all suppose to remain identities unkown here.
You get attacked just like the rest of us, from unidentified users, so get over it.
Whimpering is not making it any better either. And knowing who is throwing rocks will not make them miss when correctly aimed.
Speak for youself, I want to hear from everyone regardless of knowing their identity or not.
No there's not. You are reading the old LOM. There is no cap on the wage adjustment.
I find some of the post funny. Now here is my take, if the offer is voted down most of us hired in the mid 90s will be gone. Those of you left will more than likely be put on the docks, those docks that are left. How many of are going to be able to work in the cargo or the snake pit? Your arthritis and waist size will get the better of you. Most of the folks in the amt shops are well seasoned meaning aged and some not all could not fit into a fuel tank. Just something to think about. Either way I will be able to find a job. Enjoy!
So would it be safe to say that about 30-40% of the folks have at least 100k of debt? Out of those folks how would they benefit by voting no and hitting the street? With no moving allowance about half of those would probable file for bankruptcy after a year. That only if they are living pay check to pay check.