ThirdSeatHero
Veteran
Anomaly, if this is or was the case, you said it yourself. UA agreed to open early after ibt won representation over AMFA. UA could have said NO. And ther's nothing within the legal system to force them. They have to agree.
swamt its not the case.
In the UAL 2005-2009 agreement AMFA negotiated language that provided for negotiations to begin on a new agreement up 270 days in advance of the amendable date
See Article XXVII - Effective Date and Duration Page:121
http://teamsterssfo....mfa_UAL_CBA.pdf
The ibt won representation at UAL in April of 2008 and didn't begin negotiations until April of 2009, within the 270 period cited in Article:XXVII
http://ibtualnegotia...tions_Begin.pdf
Contract negotiations at UAL opened in the time frame layed out in our CBA. It was not FORCED open by the ibt.
FYI
here is a video from the ibt campaign at UAL where the (then) Airline Division Director promises to take UAL to court if they refused to open the contract early(*NOTE* the case he cites is a MERGER not simply one union replacing another)