jetmechline
Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2002
- Messages
- 96
- Reaction score
- 0
This past week we have been thru one of the most intense fear campaigns that any company has attempted to inflict on its employees since the time of the the infamous corporate raider FRANK LORENZO ! We are being bombarded from all sides .The company has pulled out all the stops. On Thur''s of this week the company had their HUMAN RESOURCES manager come down to the floor to give one of the most gloom and doom scenarios imaginable.
She was there to convince us to vote yes ! She insisted that the purpose of the meeting was to save us from the BIG BAD JUDGE . She informed us of how advantageous it would be , from the company''s point of view , for the judge to decide what happens to our contract . When she was asked why Siegel didn''t go ahead with this as his next step , she stated that he wanted to give us another chance and He wanted to be as fair as possible(OH BURF) !
1. If this judge is such an ally of the company''s position , why did''nt they take full advantage of this when we first voted no?
2. Why did Siegle go to the IAM INT''l and cut a deal with these self serving ***xxxxx to ignore our perfectly valid vote of Aug. 28.
3. Why won''t the IAM give the the legal grounds on which they are able to ignore our NO VOTE of Aug. 28.? Where in our bylaws is it writtened that they can ignore this vote and call for another one ?
I''m voting NO. I don''t believe the company or our union is looking out for our best interest. BRING ON THE JUDGE !At least with him we have a chance. (just my opinion)
She was there to convince us to vote yes ! She insisted that the purpose of the meeting was to save us from the BIG BAD JUDGE . She informed us of how advantageous it would be , from the company''s point of view , for the judge to decide what happens to our contract . When she was asked why Siegel didn''t go ahead with this as his next step , she stated that he wanted to give us another chance and He wanted to be as fair as possible(OH BURF) !
1. If this judge is such an ally of the company''s position , why did''nt they take full advantage of this when we first voted no?
2. Why did Siegle go to the IAM INT''l and cut a deal with these self serving ***xxxxx to ignore our perfectly valid vote of Aug. 28.
3. Why won''t the IAM give the the legal grounds on which they are able to ignore our NO VOTE of Aug. 28.? Where in our bylaws is it writtened that they can ignore this vote and call for another one ?
I''m voting NO. I don''t believe the company or our union is looking out for our best interest. BRING ON THE JUDGE !At least with him we have a chance. (just my opinion)