WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,662
- Banned
- #91
Its not the debt itself which is problematic, its debt service which is the most important. If AA doesn't have a problem servicing its debt then it won't be a problem. For the blockbuster deal AA got with Boeing/Airbus (oh yah, courtesy of Tom Horton), they got incredible financing deals.
If Parker & Co. can't deliver on their promises, then servicing the debt might become a problem.
Jacob,
Of course the real issue with debt is debt service but the amount of money necessary to service the debt is directly related to the size of the debt and to the income one has that can be used to pay all kinds of bills, of which debt service is just one.
The simple fact is that AMR will have well over $10B in debt even on a standalone basis; US brings another $5B. Both of those numbers are before pension benefits and before all of the debt with new aircraft.
AMR will have more debt that other airlines of comparable size and as a percentage of revenue even compared to smaller airlines.
AMR will have billions of dollars in pension liability that only AMR and DAL carry. DL is accelerating repayment of its pension debt.
You can talk about the cost savings that come from newer aircraft but the simple fact is that if those newer aircraft don’t provide a cost advantage over AA’s peers, then the investment hasn’t really accomplished much.
The industry has traditionally replaced aircraft fairly aggressively – which is why the industry as a group has never covered the cost of capital. Not all airlines buy the theory that new aircraft are necessary and that used or older aircraft can’t do the job at far lower costs. DL and WN both have far lower percentages of fleet expenditure commitments and both also have much healthier balance sheets. They also both have substantially lower costs than AA.
Higher debt will translate into higher debt service. Even if AA can cover the cost of its debt, other carriers will have less; a difference of a couple hundred million dollars per year devoted just to debt service can make a big difference in profitability.
Never before in the airline industry have we had just a divergence in mgmt approaches between AA and UA which are embracing the traditional airline approach of heavy fleet renewals and heavy debt and DL and WN which have a much higher tolerance for older and used aircraft as a means to have lower debt levels.
On this level alone, there will be an increasing divergence between AA and UA on one hand and DL and WN on the other.
and non-union employees continue to ask why they want anything to do with "that system."So the masses are busy infighting...
Meanwhile the bosses laugh & laugh...