The Gun Control Issue:

[pancakeramp]

Watching Peter Pan again, You need to move from Tinkerbell fantasies to real girls. Start by taking a shower.

Start by making a coherent sentence.

 

[Dog Wonder]

Read it slowly.

 

[delldude]

How come you wanted to see Obama's as bad, but now give Trump a pass?

Greatest Honky who ever ruled.

 

[delldude]

Watching Peter Pan again, You need to move from Tinkerbell fantasies to real girls. Start by taking a shower.

Peter Pan...that one those things in a hospital?

 

[delldude]

I think I stumbled upon the answer to the whole gun thing....and it won't change one word of the second amendment. And I'll bet gun ownership will go down. All we need to do is shift our focus a little...Here is the amendment in it's entirety ... with emphasis on the the problem today

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

And it occured to me that all we need to do is shift our focus to this:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

So you've got the right to own your guns. BUT...if you do, you immediately become a part of a "well regulated militia", meaning that you will be called up to defend the security of a free state in whatever godless hellhole they decide to send you to. Regardless of age. YOU are the protectors of the free state...so you own a gun, then you just enlisted.

I wonder how quickly guys like the Nuge will be getting rid of their guns. After all...he only likes to shoot them..he really doesn't like being on the business end of a "bad guys" gun. AND..the government didn't take a single one of his guns...We are just interpreting the ENTIRE second amendment.

Your interpretation of the verbiage is wanting and typical anti gun.

 

[pancakeramp]

Read it slowly.

Maybe you should let your wet nurse do the talking for you.

 

[Insp4]

xUT, what part of this do you disagree with?....... The part that he was dully elected?.......... Or do you you disagree with the mandate of 63 million that he do what they elected him to do?

 

[KCFlyer]

xUT, what part of this do you disagree with?....... The part that he was dully elected?.......... Or do you you disagree with the mandate of 63 million that he do what they elected him to do?

When he gets 63 million votes and his opponent gets 66 million votes, is it REALLY a "mandate"?

 

[KCFlyer]

Your interpretation of the verbiage is wanting and typical anti gun.

It was one sentence I am interpreting. All I ever see is "shall not be infringed" in the arguments today...but the first part of that said something about a "well regulated militia"...I guess because back when that was written...the gun owner WAS the militia. So I'm only suggesting that we read the entire amendment. You own a gun, then you are on call to "protect the security of the free state". Don't like that - don't own a gun.

 

[pancakeramp]

It was one sentence I am interpreting. All I ever see is "shall not be infringed" in the arguments today...but the first part of that said something about a "well regulated militia"...I guess because back when that was written...the gun owner WAS the militia. So I'm only suggesting that we read the entire amendment. You own a gun, then you are on call to "protect the security of the free state". Don't like that - don't own a gun.

You should try and go argue that garbage idiocy in front of the SCOTUS.

That would be fun watching them shred you to little pieces.

 

[delldude]

It was one sentence I am interpreting. All I ever see is "shall not be infringed" in the arguments today...but the first part of that said something about a "well regulated militia"...I guess because back when that was written...the gun owner WAS the militia. So I'm only suggesting that we read the entire amendment. You own a gun, then you are on call to "protect the security of the free state". Don't like that - don't own a gun.

https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/amendments/amendment-ii

 

[Insp4]

When he gets 63 million votes and his opponent gets 66 million votes, is it REALLY a "mandate"?

Yea, that's great!.......... But who's in the White House? And to answer your question, yes it does! The 63 million just happen to be the 63 million that count!........ This Country just happens to be a "Republic"! Not a " Democracy"! I do not want the States of California, and New York, deciding who should run this Country!!!!

 

[xUT]

xUT, what part of this do you disagree with?....... The part that he was dully elected?.......... Or do you you disagree with the mandate of 63 million that he do what they elected him to do?

"Let him do his job".
He is an embarrassment to the party.
There needs to be checks and balances that he doesn't care about.
You TrumpRats give him this power by kissing his a$$ every day.
I voted for this clown. Given the choices, which sucked.
Don't be surprised if the next gen vote in a socialist/communist...
You can thank Your Master Trump and his minions (you) for it.

 

[KCFlyer]

Yea, that's great!.......... But who's in the White House? And to answer your question, yes it does! The 63 million just happen to be the 63 million that count!........ This Country just happens to be a "Republic"! Not a " Democracy"! I do not want the States of California, and New York, deciding who should run this Country!!!!

Yes, they do. But you know...35% of Kansan's voted for Hillary. Yet Trump got all the states electoral votes. Which makes it look like everyone in Kansas voted for Trump. In the state that Trump won, there were almost 32 million people who voted against him. Their vote did not count. Florida for example. Over 9 million people voted. Trump beat Hillary by 1.3%. But he got all 29 electoral votes. Over 5 million people voted in MIchigan. Trump beat HIllary by less that 1% (.3%). HE got all the electoral votes. HALF of the votes in Michigan did not count.

Yeah..that 63 million is the number that "counts". But I don't believe you have a "mandate" when that 63 million is LOWER than the number your opponent got.

 

[pancakeramp]

"Let him do his job".
He is an embarrassment to the party.
There needs to be checks and balances that he doesn't care about.
You TrumpRats give him this power by kissing his a$$ every day.
I voted for this clown. Given the choices, which sucked.
Don't be surprised if the next gen vote in a socialist/communist...
You can thank Your Master Trump and his minions (you) for it.

You’re such a lying sack. You know you voted for your wet nurse Hillary.