What's new

The Boy Scout and Chik-Fil-A thread

Sure you do, you wrote it so you know dam well what you you were saying and you do not have a single shred of evidence to back up your accusation because I never said anything of the kind.


No it is not any acknowledgment of the kind. If that is how you interpret it then you have a fundamental in your understanding of US law and the American language.


Again, you seem to have no understanding of US law much less the American language because you are not understanding what I am writing.


Ah, so that is the problem. You are overlaying your bias onto my written words and trying to read what you want implied rather than reading what I wrote. I have no idea how you are arriving at what you think I implied but I can assure you that I implied no such thing.

Well you did, my 5 year old figured that out.
 
Like I said. Prove I said it. I dare you. Show me one statement that I said that supports anything you are accusing me of.
 
Since a civil union is not a marriage either in name or more importantly in legal equality there is no interest in civil unions. If civil unions were given all the same legal benefits as marriage there might be an argument but since 'separate but equal' was struck down that still might not suffice.

Not sure what you are saying but I can assure you that no religious institution was involved in my marriage at any point and time. It was a civil ceremony, no god was ever mentioned, nothing was blessed. We wrote our own vows, JP pronounced us married. JP sent the licentiate into the state and we got it in the US mail from the state after it was recorded.

It used to be a religious covenant and to a degree it still is but it is no longer the sole domain of a religious institution and as such, US law applies. People who are denied access to a marriage (or at the very least an equivalent) are being denied equal access under the law.

Simple, split the situation.Have only Government issued Civil union contracts for ALL. If a couple desires to get "married" the church takes care of that. This way we get equality and further seperate religion from Government.
 
Hey, I'm all for it. Until that happens same sex marriages will have to be allowed. Why do you think the religious institutions have not proposed that?


I believe it is because they need/enjoy the current protection of marriage that government provides such as DOMA.
 
Sorry Bub, your implied words.
You twisted and turned everything as the thread unfolded.
Have a nice day.
 
Freedom of Choice

Palin%20729.png
 
Unfortunately he does not seem to be smarted than his 5 yr old. OH well. What can you do.
Sorry Bub, your implied words.
You twisted and turned everything as the thread unfolded.
Have a nice day.

Not my fault that you cannot understand the American language and have limited understanding of how the US legal system works. All you have is more accusations and not a shred of evidence to back it up.
 
Unfortunately he does not seem to be smarted than his 5 yr old. OH well. What can you do.


Not my fault that you cannot understand the American language and have limited understanding of how the US legal system works. All you have is more accusations and not a shred of evidence to back it up.

Don't worry you have already revealed all the evidence any one would need through your own words.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top