Shooting at UCLA

  
13427909_1022970411113427_2664441110342010354_n.jpg
 
Insp4 said:
 
 
Well Pete...whadya say we change both?  I'm sure we could get some to agree to the "can't run for president" part, but would the NRA really stand for prohibiting a person on the FBI watch list from buying a non automatic automatic weapon?   Right now that might "open the door" to prohibiting some patriots from getting a gun. 
 
Kev3188 said:
So in this case, we shoulda just tossed the 4th out? Before you answer, remember this guy was an American citizen...
In this case, being that is a WAR with radical islamic TERRORISTS, the gloves must come off. I know Obummer and the libtards like yourself don't want this war, but it's here, and it wants us. It wants us all DEAD. Sorry to say, those are the facts.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #65
Hackman said:
In this case, being that is a WAR with radical islamic TERRORISTS, the gloves must come off. I know Obummer and the libtards like yourself don't want this war, but it's here, and it wants us. It wants us all DEAD. Sorry to say, those are the facts.
So we should or should not toss out the 4th?
 
Are you willing to have the State "watch" you? Bug your phone? Tap your computer?
 
KCFlyer said:
Well Pete...whadya say we change both?  I'm sure we could get some to agree to the "can't run for president" part, but would the NRA really stand for prohibiting a person on the FBI watch list from buying a non automatic automatic weapon?   Right now that might "open the door" to prohibiting some patriots from getting a gun.
I don't see any "Patriots" watching terrorist jihad videos, cheering 9/11, believing in 7th century sharia, supporting ISIS, going on vacation in Saudi Arabia, killing gays, and wanting us all DEAD in the United States. See the difference? Of course not. Why? Libtardation.
 
Hackman said:
I don't see any "Patriots" watching terrorist jihad videos, cheering 9/11, believing in 7th century sharia, supporting ISIS, going on vacation in Saudi Arabia, killing gays, and wanting us all DEAD in the United States. See the difference? Of course not. Why? Libtardation.
 
How come the NRA fought any kind of "gun control" that would p[revent  a gun shop from selling  a jihadist a gun?   That's one of those "common sense" things that Bernie talked about, but he's a socialist.   I think we should restrict gun ownership from people on an FBI watch list, or from a redneck patriot who is convicted of domestic violence for punching his honey in a drunken rage.  People who are dangerous shouldn't own guns....but YOUR NRA dues paid to lobby to insure that this gunman wasn't hindered in his pursuit to purchase a weapon.  God bless America.  God Bless our founding fathers.  And God bless the second amendment. 
 
Kev3188 said:
So we should or should not toss out the 4th?
 
Are you willing to have the State "watch" you? Bug your phone? Tap your computer?
Like I said, Islamic terrorists, we're at war with a enemy worse than the Nazis.
Sure tap my laptop and phone all day. They won't find any jihad videos, ISIS propaganda, or plane tickets to Saudi Arabia.
How about you Kevy, got any radical Islamic propaganda on your laptop? You sound kinda sceered.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #71
Well of course you'd roll right over. Probably'd go out of your way to help, and then blubber some sort of thank you as they marched back out.
 
KCFlyer said:
How come the NRA fought any kind of "gun control" that would p[revent  a gun shop from selling  a jihadist a gun?   That's one of those "common sense" things that Bernie talked about, but he's a socialist.   I think we should restrict gun ownership from people on an FBI watch list, or from a redneck patriot who is convicted of domestic violence for punching his honey in a drunken rage.  People who are dangerous shouldn't own guns....but YOUR NRA dues paid to lobby to insure that this gunman wasn't hindered in his pursuit to purchase a weapon.  God bless America.  God Bless our founding fathers.  And God bless the second amendment.
The NRA fought gun control as a general purpose because the leftists like you want to generally ban all firearms from private citizens who pass a ATF background. I don't know if the NRA specially targeted a jihadist from not owning a gun. You have proof of that? BTW the Bernout has no common sense.
Your conflating a "redneck patriot" who beat his wife to a jihadist who shouts death to America. If you don't know, being convicted of domestic violence precludes one from buying a legal firearm.
Banning legal ownership of a firearm won't stop the jihadists from killing. The left wants to deflect the real problem of terrorism with gun control. Why? Because Obummer doesn't want to deal with it, or on the more sinister side Obummer is a sympathizer of the jihad. He wants to shut down Gitmo, and released 5 of the worst terrorists for 1 deserter. He did state that the world owes Islam. Obummer could wipe these savages out but he will not. Why is that?
 
Kev3188 said:
Well of course you'd roll right over. Probably'd go out of your way to help, and then blubber some sort of thank you as they marched back out.
Sounds like your worried the state might find some jihad training vids on your 'Puter Kevy. Just turn yourself in, I know a good lawyer.
 
Hackman said:
The NRA fought gun control as a general purpose because the leftists like you want to generally ban all firearms from private citizens who pass a ATF background. I don't know if the NRA specially targeted a jihadist from not owning a gun. You have proof of that? BTW the Bernout has no common sense.
Your conflating a "redneck patriot" who beat his wife to a jihadist who shouts death to America. If you don't know, being convicted of domestic violence precludes one from buying a legal firearm.
Banning legal ownership of a firearm won't stop the jihadists from killing. The left wants to deflect the real problem of terrorism with gun control. Why? Because Obummer doesn't want to deal with it, or on the more sinister side Obummer is a sympathizer of the jihad. He wants to shut down Gitmo, and released 5 of the worst terrorists for 1 deserter. He did state that the world owes Islam. Obummer could wipe these savages out but he will not. Why is that?
 
 
Like I said....since the redneck patriot who blackened both of his wife/girlfriends eyes because they had the gall to question why he was coming home so late should still be allowed to own a gun because he never shouted "death to America".  But because leftly liberals might turn any law that would have prevented someone who apparently did should "death to America"..I guess he must have because he had the attention of the FBI...from legally buying a gun into something to use against a redneck who lost his temper....it's best for our rights as citizens to just allow the guy to buy a gun.    What I find interesting is your debate with Kev....second amendment is holy....fourth amendment is okay to break because "if you don't have anything to hide, you don't have anything to worry about".   
 
Back
Top