traderjake said:
Everyone has an opinion, just because you found one that matches your's doesn't make it the Holy Grail.
In case you haven't figured it out people vote you down because you're a total Delta schill.
no, it really comes down to some people being willing to admit that someone else really might do things better than you.
I have battled an entrenched mindset AArrogance among AAers that they can AAdmit no wrong that spans 10 years of my interaction on aviation chat forums.
No other carrier has employees who are so willing to deny the truth that is obvious for everyone else to see in order to deny admitting reality.
I am loyal to DL, for sure. But there are precious few people here who are willing to admit that DL is really running an outstanding business compared to practically any other airline in the US, and perhaps the world, and certainly among DL's network airline peers.
Does that mean it will always stay that way? No.
But DL has done an outstanding job of turning their airline around and of becoming a leader in the industry that is perhaps farther out front of its peers as has existed among any network airline since deregulation.
DL is creating change and the rest of the industry is trying to react.
I said after the AA-US merger that I am willing to give AA an opportunity to demonstrate whether it can succeed and thrive like other carriers.
But there is no way that I am going to sit by and accept rosy, pie in the sky attributes about AA by forgetting the reality of the business any more than I am willing to ask anyone else to do that for DL.
You are more than free to speak honestly and candidly about where DL is truly missing it - not the occasional operational incident that is the norm for an airline that operates thousands of flights per day....
robbedagain said:
just fyi for the month of jan alone the new AA beat delta in 2 categories ontime and bags thus the employees are getting 100
and, IIRC, AA cancelled more flights than DL during the month and I'm not even sure that the stats include the consolidated AA/US. Most stats are and will be reported separately for quite some time.
Further, one month doesn't a trend make. And if new AA really does deliver operational excellence and financial strength, then it will translate very quickly into a much higher stock price and increased revenues.
Right now, AA is in the same post-merger euphoria that every other airline has been in. There is nothing wrong with having hope for the future.
But failing to recognize there are true strategic challenges which AA has to face and which I have talked about is simply setting yourselves up to allow me to point out that what I have said is real.
Despite years of me pointing out, no one has yet to point that any other network/legacy carrier has faced the string of strategic challenges that AA faces over the next year - as highlighted by me and in the article - plus others such as increased competitive growth in Latin America and the Pacific.
if it makes you feel empowered to hit the red button, go for it.
I racked up hundreds of negative points in discussions about AA's Pacific losses - and yet what I said has been validated multiple times from DOT data and in other internet discussions and validated by AA's own cutbacks exactly where I have said AA has been weak - such as NYC and Chicago to Japan.
Until someone says that this forum is no longer a place for the valid discussion of solid airline strategic issues, I will raise them. Those that can participate are free to do so; those that want to throw tomatoes and lift denials will be the ones that will be shown to be unable to participate accurately in these discussions.