[[/blockquote]
Was it By straight out seniority... or by PT first and INT and FT last classification?
----------------
[/blockquote]
According to the contract, they can't just layoff PT first; it should be by seniority.
----------------
[/blockquote]
Welllllllll.........last year during the big furlough packet scare of late SEPT, they handed out packets to ALL P/T for sure, even if 25 years, and the last 4 or 5 years of FT, if Im not mistaken..'Twas the basis for a lot of talk, discussion, and misinterpretation and not sure if it was ever resolved, since the remaining offices didnt have to let anyone go.
----------------
[/blockquote]
I know, I was one of the part-timers who got the packet. Big goof on middle management's part. It was resolved, and here in INT anyway, they took back the displacment packets from most of us part-timers.
Was it By straight out seniority... or by PT first and INT and FT last classification?
----------------
[/blockquote]
According to the contract, they can't just layoff PT first; it should be by seniority.
----------------
[/blockquote]
Welllllllll.........last year during the big furlough packet scare of late SEPT, they handed out packets to ALL P/T for sure, even if 25 years, and the last 4 or 5 years of FT, if Im not mistaken..'Twas the basis for a lot of talk, discussion, and misinterpretation and not sure if it was ever resolved, since the remaining offices didnt have to let anyone go.
----------------
[/blockquote]
I know, I was one of the part-timers who got the packet. Big goof on middle management's part. It was resolved, and here in INT anyway, they took back the displacment packets from most of us part-timers.