SWAMT - [background=rgb(255, 255, 255)]Well if he was "dumb", then why did Lee Seham represent him and he was re-instated with FULL BACK PAY?[/background]
It took me some time but I had the Local check his case and the primary reason the arbitrator granted it was because Dan was denied his 29f rights (denial of Union Representation). That happens every so often because management supervisors aren't the brightest people around. Kind of reminds you of Dan doesn't it?
It took me some time but I had the Local check his case and the primary reason the arbitrator granted it was because Dan was denied his 29f rights (denial of Union Representation). That happens every so often because management supervisors aren't the brightest people around. Kind of reminds you of Dan doesn't it?