JimJimmyJim
Advanced
I totally agree with you and I have that respect for you and all TWAers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's a sad fact that a decision to close any facility, said facility being a part of a corporation run strictly by numbers (read bean counters and cpas) never considers the actual assets of what is being trashed - there's no value that can be assigned to people and their collective knowledge on a balance sheet, therefore, that value doesn't exist. Of course, this statement or anything similar will be poo-poohed by those who freely admit not working for AMR due to their infinite wisdom.<_< -------Jim, the only thing I've expected of any AA employee is the respect due us as exTWA AMT's! We may not have seen eye to eye on a lot of issues, but I feel most exTWAers do respect their fellow AA counterparts! ---------Will AA close MCIE? I have to admit it looks that way! I wish it were not so! What a waste of talent and resources! :down:
Yup - I don't have it either.<_< -------Sorry Goose! All I have is fourty years in the Airline Game, plus four more Military!----- By the standards you put forward, I guess I just don't have the right stuff!!! :unsure:
<_< ----- Why is it you'all are so anxious to close MCI? As Ken said, they do have those two big bays that can handle anything in AA's fleet including the 777.----- Although AA has access to wide body hanger space all over their domestic system that is going unused! The old exTWA hanger at LAX was used for 747, L1011 "C" checks. Two at a time! And their own hanger at LAX, I believe, is big enough to handle wide bodies!------- So they need more??? :huh:
<_< -----Which leaves MCIE!----- Two "Super Bays," experienced workforce, centrally located, and relatively inexpensive!------- So why do you feel they're so eager to close it? :huh: Or is this all just a matter of wishful thinking on the part of the AFW/TUL membership???Given the costs who is going to do heavy checks at LAX? Continental pulled out in the early ninties. Swissair Technics tried to do heavy maintenance at Palmdale and it did not work out. Then of course there's the plans to tear down those hangars anyway. When it ahppens who knows. However why spend the money and take the chance?
But the reality has already been noted: the fleet size will soon be smaller than it was when there was only one AA maintenance base and AA really doesn't want to commit to MRO on a large scale.
Advance notice (and I'm talking about several months, not 30 days) would give the smart ones the ability to plan an exit strategy into another career field or relocating without a big rush at the last minute.
Is this too much to ask? Guess so.
There was a meeting in June at negotiations in MCI where the company discussed the future workload in overhaul and the "white spaces" that would result in some job losses by 2012. I believe this was put out in the Negotiations update for June. But up until then they had plenty of work in the bases. The white spaces were a few years down the road and they will be generated by the retirement of MD-80s. The new 737s wont be due for heavy checks for a while and they may be retiring MD-80s faster than they are recieving brand new 737s if they continue to shrink capacity. The message at negotiations was that they needed lower labor costs to generate more 3P work and save the 600 to 800 jobs that the white spaces would result in. With an expected attrition rate of 300 to 400 mechanics a year(systemwide) the company would have to hire 900 to 1200 just to maintian current total headcount so basically we are chasing 3P work with a concessionary contract for people who dont even work here yet.Bob are you allowed to explain to us the meeting that took place concerning what AA has concering with the retirement of the MD80,what the workload looks like for next couple of years? I was told it was a presentation with Romaneo and staff.I was told by a source also that there will be alot of empty space coming up in the next couple of years.Also I notice lately that with the flight changes coming up some class 2 will be down to less than 5 a/c on overnight and with a daytime trips around the 20's.Thoughts.
There was a meeting in June at negotiations in MCI where the company discussed the future workload in overhaul and the "white spaces" that would result in some job losses by 2012. I believe this was put out in the Negotiations update for June. But up until then they had plenty of work in the bases. The white spaces were a few years down the road and they will be generated by the retirement of MD-80s. The new 737s wont be due for heavy checks for a while and they may be retiring MD-80s faster than they are recieving brand new 737s if they continue to shrink capacity. The message at negotiations was that they needed lower labor costs to generate more 3P work and save the 600 to 800 jobs that the white spaces would result in. With an expected attrition rate of 300 to 400 mechanics a year(systemwide) the company would have to hire 900 to 1200 just to maintian current total headcount so basically we are chasing 3P work with a concessionary contract for people who dont even work here yet.
While the fate of small class II stations is always precarious we were told that no rifs planned this year. Thats not really an answer but thats all I got.
My personal feeling is that they will do whatever falls on thier doorstep,when it suits them. Right now the company is shrinking so they are using it as a ploy to gain more concessions. The "white spaces", the past has shown me that the company will get their concessions and cut the heads anyway if they feel they need to.<_< ------ Bob, do you feel the Company is committed to bring in more MRO work? Or are they just using it as a negotiations ploy? Or are they even talking MRO work at this point? :huh: