Plane skids off runway at LaGuardia

[eolesen]

Looks like it. Would be somewhat ironic if it's in the same bay where the US Airways F-100 that almost went in the water was stored back in 1992.

 

[WorldTraveler]

and where WN's much newer 737 made a stop before being carted off, wait, wait, with its titles removed.

sad use of a hangar but it likely won't be the last time.

 

[700UW]

Looks like it. Would be somewhat ironic if it's in the same bay where the US Airways F-100 that almost went in the water was stored back in 1992.

That was an F28, not a F100, and US also had a 734 that had an accident at LGA.

 

[Kev3188]

Agree E


that AA hangar is that the original hangar?

 
 

Looks like it. Would be somewhat ironic if it's in the same bay where the US Airways F-100 that almost went in the water was stored back in 1992.

Is that the one the NW A319 was stored in for awhile, or was that in the MQ-owned hangar?

 

[robbedagain]

kev did NW have an incident there too?   any details on it?

 

[700UW]

I believe it was a NW A319 that hit a jetway causing substantial damage.
 

•  

• On 19 January 2003, Northwest Airlines Airbus A319-114 and registered as N313NB, was damaged by maintenance personnel at LaGuardia Airport being taxied from a maintenance area to the gate, striking the gate and a 757, collapsing the nosegear. The Airbus was damaged beyond repair and written off.

 
 

 

[eolesen]

That was an F28, not a F100

Sorry, forgot it was a little motor Fokker instead of the big motor Fokker (the F100 was the F28-1000...).

 

[700UW]

Actually Piedmont flew the F28-1000 and the F28-4000.
 
The F100 was certified as the F28-0100.
 

 

 

[robbedagain]

thanks 700
 
I sure do remember working those F100s   hated them   nice to fly on them  hated working them   fiber glass floor in the cargo bin made for unpleasant loading n unloading

 

[Kev3188]

<p>

I believe it was a NW A319 that hit a jetway causing substantial damage.
 

•  

That's the one...

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

It is no wonder they couldn't stop. 500 mph is a little hot for an LGA landing. Sigh.

View attachment 10619

 

[swamt]

It is no wonder they couldn't stop. 500 mph is a little hot for an LGA landing. Sigh.

image.jpg

What do you mean a little hot?  That's freakin cruising at altitude speeds.  Landing speed is somewhere around 140-180 I believe, therefore the 500 you state is more than 3 times the speed they should have been going.  200 mph would have been a little hot, 500 would be freakin on fire...
BTW, if you trust CNN for your news you better go somewhere else for it...

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

What do you mean a little hot?  That's freakin cruising at altitude speeds.  Landing speed is somewhere around 140-180 I believe, therefore the 500 you state is more than 3 times the speed they should have been going.  200 mph would have been a little hot, 500 would be freakin on fire...
BTW, if you trust CNN for your news you better go somewhere else for it...

I guess recognizing sarcasm is not your strong suit.

Here is another for you:

View attachment 10620

Sexy looking MD-88

 

[swamt]

I guess recognizing sarcasm is not your strong suit.

Here is another for you:

image.jpg

Sexy looking MD-88

LOL. That's CNN for you...

 

[FWAAA]

Anybody watch Saturday Night Live last night?

The night’s best Update one-liner? The survivors of the La Guardia plane crash will be charged a $45 survival fee by Delta.

http://www.ew.com/recap/saturday-night-live-season-40-episode-15

Watch the clip here: https://screen.yahoo.com/weekend-part-1-072354961.html